EGGQ vs. TSMY
EGGQ (NestYield Visionary ETF) and TSMY (YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGQ returned 63.58% vs 96.92% for TSMY. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EGGQ charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSMY.
Performance
EGGQ vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EGGQ having a 39.32% return and TSMY slightly lower at 38.94%.
EGGQ
- 1D
- 4.92%
- 1M
- 17.67%
- YTD
- 39.32%
- 6M
- 38.36%
- 1Y
- 63.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMY
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 9.89%
- YTD
- 38.94%
- 6M
- 42.47%
- 1Y
- 96.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGGQ vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF | 39.32% | 25.92% | -1.32% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 38.94% | 41.00% | -1.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGGQ and TSMY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2024 | 0.71 |
The correlation between EGGQ and TSMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGGQ vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank
EGGQ
TSMY
EGGQ vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGGQ | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 3.38 | -1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 4.00 | -1.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.53 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 6.40 | -3.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 23.81 | -14.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGGQ | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 3.38 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.46 | 1.60 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
EGGQ vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGGQ drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, smaller than the maximum TSMY drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGQ and TSMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGGQ | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.70% | -31.15% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.76% | -15.50% | -4.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -5.52% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.28% | 4.17% | +3.11% |
Volatility
EGGQ vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison
NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) has a higher volatility of 12.50% compared to YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) at 9.35%. This indicates that EGGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGGQ | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.50% | 9.35% | +3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.04% | 22.65% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.24% | 28.83% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.67% | 33.23% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.67% | 33.23% | -0.56% |
EGGQ vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGGQ has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGGQ vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison
EGGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than TSMY's 51.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF | 5.48% | 5.70% | 0.00% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 51.48% | 56.76% | 13.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGGQ and TSMY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EGGQ has higher volatility (12.50%) compared to TSMY (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGQ dropped -22.70% vs TSMY's -31.15%.
On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 96.92% vs 63.58% for EGGQ. On fees, EGGQ is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, TSMY has been the lower-risk option at 9.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 96.92% return vs 63.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EGGQ is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSMY.
TSMY has the higher dividend yield at 51.48%, compared with 5.48% for EGGQ.
They also come from different issuers: NestYield and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGQ and 0.99% for TSMY.
TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGGQ and TSMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer