EGGQ vs. TQQQ
EGGQ (NestYield Visionary ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - EGGQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by NestYield, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). EGGQ is actively managed, while TQQQ is passively managed. Over the past year, EGGQ returned 63.58% vs 145.30% for TQQQ. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EGGQ charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
EGGQ vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGGQ achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return.
EGGQ
- 1D
- 4.92%
- 1M
- 17.67%
- YTD
- 39.32%
- 6M
- 38.36%
- 1Y
- 63.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 33.57%
- YTD
- 65.71%
- 6M
- 58.23%
- 1Y
- 145.30%
- 3Y*
- 69.92%
- 5Y*
- 29.86%
- 10Y*
- 45.44%
EGGQ vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF | 39.32% | 25.92% | -1.32% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 65.71% | 34.35% | -2.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGGQ and TQQQ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between EGGQ and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGGQ vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EGGQ
TQQQ
EGGQ vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EGGQ | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 3.07 | -1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 3.19 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 4.08 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 13.38 | -4.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EGGQ | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 3.07 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.46 | 0.74 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
EGGQ vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGGQ drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGQ and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGGQ | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.70% | -81.66% | +58.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.76% | -36.97% | +17.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -18.53% | +12.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.28% | 11.28% | -4.00% |
Volatility
EGGQ vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) is 12.50%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that EGGQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGGQ | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.50% | 13.26% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.04% | 36.05% | -11.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.24% | 47.63% | -16.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.67% | 66.55% | -33.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.67% | 65.98% | -33.31% |
EGGQ vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGGQ has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGGQ vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
EGGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF | 5.48% | 5.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.36% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGGQ and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to EGGQ (12.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGQ dropped -22.70% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 1-year performance, TQQQ leads with 145.30% vs 63.58% for EGGQ. On fees, EGGQ is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, EGGQ has been the lower-risk option at 12.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 145.30% return vs 63.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EGGQ is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
EGGQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.
EGGQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: NestYield and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGQ and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGGQ and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer