EGGQ vs. ACYS
EGGQ (NestYield Visionary ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGGQ charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
EGGQ vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EGGQ
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- 6M
- 24.65%
- YTD
- 26.25%
- 1Y
- 34.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGGQ vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF | 13.70% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGGQ and ACYS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGGQ vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank
EGGQ
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EGGQ vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Visionary ETF (EGGQ) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EGGQ | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EGGQ vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGGQ drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGQ and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGGQ | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.70% | -0.63% | -22.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.30% | -0.05% | -15.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -0.14% | -5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | — | — |
Volatility
EGGQ vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGGQ | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.29% | 3.44% | +33.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.12% | 3.44% | +32.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.12% | 3.44% | +32.68% |
EGGQ vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGGQ has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGGQ vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
EGGQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% |
EGGQ NestYield Visionary ETF | 6.41% | 5.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGGQ and ACYS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EGGQ.
EGGQ has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: NestYield and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGQ and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for EGGQ and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer