EFZ vs. SPDN
EFZ (ProShares Short MSCI EAFE) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - EFZ tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (-100%) while SPDN tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EFZ returned -8.43%/yr vs -12.18%/yr for SPDN. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EFZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
EFZ vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFZ achieves a -9.46% return, which is significantly lower than SPDN's -6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EFZ has outperformed SPDN with an annualized return of -8.43%, while SPDN has yielded a comparatively lower -12.18% annualized return.
EFZ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 1Y
- -17.52%
- 3Y*
- -9.95%
- 5Y*
- -6.08%
- 10Y*
- -8.43%
- ALL TIME*
- -7.52%
SPDN
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- -12.79%
- 3Y*
- -10.75%
- 5Y*
- -7.84%
- 10Y*
- -12.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -12.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $154.74K | $246.78K | $380.96K | |
| $433.42M | $387.95M | $422.31M |
EFZ vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | -9.46% | -20.92% | 2.90% | -10.38% | 13.15% | -12.75% | -16.02% | -16.56% | 16.26% | -20.18% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -6.42% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -15.04% | 18.63% | -23.72% | -24.56% | -21.94% | 5.41% | -17.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFZ and SPDN is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2016 | 0.77 |
The correlation between EFZ and SPDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFZ vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
EFZ
SPDN
EFZ vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.87 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.71 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | -1.27 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFZ vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFZ drawdown since its inception was -88.15%, which is greater than SPDN's maximum drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFZ and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.15% | -75.31% | -12.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.58% | -15.93% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.82% | -38.24% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.12% | -43.85% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.58% | -73.97% | +12.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.14% | -74.80% | -13.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -48.93% | -18.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 8.90% | +2.45% |
Volatility
EFZ vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 3.55%. This indicates that EFZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 3.55% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.10% | 10.15% | +3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 12.98% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 16.97% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 18.03% | -0.92% |
EFZ vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFZ vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
EFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than SPDN's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | 4.04% | 4.55% | 5.29% | 4.66% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.56% | 0.34% | 0.00% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.32% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFZ and SPDN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFZ has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SPDN (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFZ dropped -88.15% vs SPDN's -75.31%.
On 10-year performance, EFZ leads with -8.43% vs -12.18% for SPDN. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFZ has performed better with a -8.43% return vs -12.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFZ.
EFZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 3.32% for SPDN.
EFZ tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-100%), while SPDN tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFZ and 0.50% for SPDN.
SPDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFZ and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer