PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFV vs. CEMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EFV vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EFV vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
5.41%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
2.97%53.50%3.64%17.49%-9.79%16.63%0.05%20.87%-18.08%25.74%
Different Trading Currencies

EFV is traded in USD, while CEMS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CEMS.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 5.41% return, which is significantly higher than CEMS.DE's 2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, EFV has underperformed CEMS.DE with an annualized return of 9.76%, while CEMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.48% annualized return.


EFV

1D
1.24%
1M
-3.73%
YTD
5.41%
6M
12.82%
1Y
33.32%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
9.76%

CEMS.DE

1D
2.60%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
2.97%
6M
13.35%
1Y
36.99%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
10.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFV vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EFV vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMS.DE
CEMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFV vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFVCEMS.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

2.01

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

2.54

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.11

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.45

10.95

+0.50

EFV vs. CEMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFV and CEMS.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFVCEMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.01

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.72

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.53

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.41

-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between EFV and CEMS.DE is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EFV vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, while CEMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.95%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EFV vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than CEMS.DE's maximum drawdown of -46.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and CEMS.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EFVCEMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.94%

-40.20%

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-13.91%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.84%

-19.55%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-40.20%

-2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

-5.11%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.93%

-7.58%

-7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.89%

+0.03%

Volatility

EFV vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) have volatilities of 6.67% and 6.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EFVCEMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

6.57%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

11.32%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.96%

18.31%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

18.29%

-2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

19.52%

-1.65%