PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFRW.DE vs. LYPS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EFRW.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (EFRW.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EFRW.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFRW.DE achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than LYPS.DE's -2.96% return.


EFRW.DE

1D
1.91%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
1.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LYPS.DE

1D
1.72%
1M
-3.11%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
0.12%
1Y
10.32%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
13.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFRW.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFRW.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than LYPS.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

EFRW.DE vs. LYPS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFRW.DE

LYPS.DE
LYPS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFRW.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (EFRW.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EFRW.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFRW.DELYPS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.92

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between EFRW.DE and LYPS.DE is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EFRW.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Dividend Comparison

EFRW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYPS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFRW.DE
iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
1.03%1.00%1.21%1.04%2.11%1.09%1.54%1.63%1.93%1.75%1.88%2.02%

Drawdowns

EFRW.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFRW.DE drawdown since its inception was -7.12%, smaller than the maximum LYPS.DE drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFRW.DE and LYPS.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EFRW.DELYPS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-33.81%

+26.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.35%

-5.17%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.36%

-4.05%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

Volatility

EFRW.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EFRW.DELYPS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

17.28%

-5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.40%

15.24%

-3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

16.16%

-4.76%