PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFRW.DE vs. SP2D.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EFRW.DE vs. SP2D.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (EFRW.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SP2D.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EFRW.DE vs. SP2D.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFRW.DE achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than SP2D.DE's 1.48% return.


EFRW.DE

1D
1.91%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
1.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SP2D.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
-4.08%
YTD
1.48%
6M
3.48%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFRW.DE vs. SP2D.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFRW.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SP2D.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

EFRW.DE vs. SP2D.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFRW.DE

SP2D.DE
SP2D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SP2D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP2D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP2D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SP2D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP2D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFRW.DE vs. SP2D.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (EFRW.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist (SP2D.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EFRW.DE vs. SP2D.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFRW.DESP2D.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.44

+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between EFRW.DE and SP2D.DE is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EFRW.DE vs. SP2D.DE - Dividend Comparison

EFRW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SP2D.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.


TTM2025202420232022
EFRW.DE
iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SP2D.DE
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Dist
1.39%1.39%1.34%1.49%1.54%

Drawdowns

EFRW.DE vs. SP2D.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFRW.DE drawdown since its inception was -7.12%, smaller than the maximum SP2D.DE drawdown of -22.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFRW.DE and SP2D.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EFRW.DESP2D.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-22.69%

+15.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.35%

-4.86%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.36%

-6.08%

+4.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

Volatility

EFRW.DE vs. SP2D.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EFRW.DESP2D.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

16.66%

-5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.40%

15.13%

-3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

15.13%

-3.73%