EFIV vs. RIVN
EFIV (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index, while RIVN (Rivian Automotive, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, EFIV returned 21.82%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for RIVN. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFIV vs. RIVN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFIV achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than RIVN's -7.31% return.
EFIV
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.48%
- 10Y*
- —
RIVN
- 1D
- 5.67%
- 1M
- 25.91%
- YTD
- -7.31%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 27.14%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFIV vs. RIVN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 9.91% | 18.47% | 23.80% | 27.92% | -17.76% | 2.82% |
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc. | -7.31% | 48.20% | -43.31% | 27.29% | -82.23% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFIV and RIVN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.47 |
The correlation between EFIV and RIVN shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFIV vs. RIVN — Risk / Return Rank
EFIV
RIVN
EFIV vs. RIVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFIV | RIVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.14 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 0.64 | +2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 1.28 | +13.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFIV | RIVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 0.43 | +2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | -0.41 | +1.47 |
Drawdowns
EFIV vs. RIVN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum RIVN drawdown of -95.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and RIVN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFIV | RIVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.52% | -95.12% | +70.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -42.54% | +33.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.23% | -69.61% | +50.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -89.38% | +88.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -86.37% | +81.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 21.31% | -19.27% |
Volatility
EFIV vs. RIVN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) is 3.14%, while Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) has a volatility of 14.60%. This indicates that EFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFIV | RIVN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 14.60% | -11.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 47.04% | -38.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 63.49% | -51.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 77.39% | -60.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 77.39% | -60.56% |
Dividends
EFIV vs. RIVN - Dividend Comparison
EFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while RIVN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.37% | 1.64% | 1.19% | 0.65% |
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFIV and RIVN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIVN has higher volatility (14.60%) compared to EFIV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFIV dropped -24.52% vs RIVN's -95.12%.
EFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFIV and RIVN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer