EFIV vs. PBFR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR).

EFIV and PBFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFIV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 ESG Index. It was launched on Jul 27, 2020. PBFR is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024.

Performance

EFIV vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EFIV vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF	-4.39%	18.47%	7.52%
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	-0.75%	10.44%	5.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFIV achieves a -4.39% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's -0.75% return.

EFIV

• 1D: 2.85%
• 1M: -5.17%
• YTD: -4.39%
• 6M: -0.28%
• 1Y: 19.21%
• 3Y*: 18.43%
• 5Y*: 12.58%
• 10Y*: —

PBFR

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -1.46%
• YTD: -0.75%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 10.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFIV vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFIV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.

PBFR

PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF

EFIV

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF

Return for Risk

EFIV vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFIV

EFIV Risk / Return Rank: 68
EFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 69
EFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

PBFR

PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 79
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFIV vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFIV	PBFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.34	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	1.99	-0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.35	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	1.84	-0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.57	10.86	-3.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFIV vs. PBFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the PBFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFIV and PBFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFIV	PBFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	1.34	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	1.20	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between EFIV and PBFR is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EFIV vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison

EFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than PBFR's 0.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF	1.08%	1.03%	1.20%	1.37%	1.64%	1.19%	0.65%
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EFIV vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and PBFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFIV	PBFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.52%	-8.50%	-16.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.50%	-6.15%	-6.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.86%	-1.56%	-5.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.92%	-0.68%	-4.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	1.04%	+1.61%

Volatility

EFIV vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) at 2.42%. This indicates that EFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFIV	PBFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	2.42%	+2.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.22%	3.46%	+5.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.16%	8.18%	+9.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.94%	7.13%	+9.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.96%	7.13%	+9.83%