EFIV vs. IVV
EFIV (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - EFIV tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index while IVV tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFIV returned 14.48%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for IVV. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EFIV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
EFIV vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFIV achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return.
EFIV
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.48%
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
EFIV vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 9.91% | 18.47% | 23.80% | 27.92% | -17.76% | 31.70% | 16.69% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.85% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 17.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFIV and IVV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between EFIV and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFIV vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFIV
IVV
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
EFIV
IVV
Communication Services
EFIV
IVV
Financial Services
EFIV
IVV
Healthcare
EFIV
IVV
Industrials
EFIV
IVV
Consumer Defensive
EFIV
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
EFIV
IVV
Energy
EFIV
IVV
Real Estate
EFIV
IVV
Utilities
EFIV
IVV
Basic Materials
EFIV
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFIV vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
EFIV
IVV
EFIV vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFIV | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.43 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 3.17 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 14.71 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFIV | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.39 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.83 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.45 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
EFIV vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFIV | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.52% | -55.25% | +30.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -8.89% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.23% | -18.75% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -24.53% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -0.76% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -10.78% | +5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.91% | +0.13% |
Volatility
EFIV vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that EFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFIV | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.87% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 8.90% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 11.80% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 16.88% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 18.05% | -1.22% |
EFIV vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFIV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EFIV vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
EFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than IVV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.37% | 1.64% | 1.19% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, EFIV and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EFIV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFIV dropped -24.52% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 5-year performance, EFIV leads with 14.48% vs 13.88% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFIV has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 13.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for EFIV.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.94% for EFIV.
EFIV tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EFIV and 0.03% for IVV.
EFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFIV and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer