PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFIV vs. CPSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EFIV vs. CPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EFIV vs. CPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
-4.39%18.47%17.41%
CPSM
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May
0.81%7.21%6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFIV achieves a -4.39% return, which is significantly lower than CPSM's 0.81% return.


EFIV

1D
2.85%
1M
-5.17%
YTD
-4.39%
6M
-0.28%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*

CPSM

1D
0.28%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.81%
6M
2.00%
1Y
7.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFIV vs. CPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFIV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CPSM's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EFIV vs. CPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFIV
EFIV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

CPSM
CPSM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFIV vs. CPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFIVCPSMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.10

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

1.70

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.51

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.57

9.75

-2.18

EFIV vs. CPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the CPSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFIV and CPSM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFIVCPSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.10

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.47

-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between EFIV and CPSM is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EFIV vs. CPSM - Dividend Comparison

EFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while CPSM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
1.08%1.03%1.20%1.37%1.64%1.19%0.65%
CPSM
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EFIV vs. CPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, which is greater than CPSM's maximum drawdown of -5.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and CPSM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EFIVCPSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.52%

-5.19%

-19.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-4.99%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-0.08%

-6.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-0.22%

-4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

0.77%

+1.88%

Volatility

EFIV vs. CPSM - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM) at 0.68%. This indicates that EFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EFIVCPSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

0.68%

+4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

1.18%

+8.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

6.69%

+11.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

5.31%

+11.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

5.31%

+11.65%