EFIV vs. CPSD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EFIV (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF) and CPSD (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December) are both exchange-traded funds - EFIV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index, while CPSD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. EFIV is passively managed, while CPSD is actively managed. Over the past year, EFIV returned 30.49% vs 9.16% for CPSD. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFIV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CPSD.

Performance

EFIV vs. CPSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFIV achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than CPSD's 2.55% return.

EFIV

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 4.63%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 6M: 10.51%
• 1Y: 30.49%
• 3Y*: 21.82%
• 5Y*: 14.48%
• 10Y*: —

CPSD

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: 2.99%
• 1Y: 9.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFIV vs. CPSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF	9.91%	18.47%	-3.19%
CPSD Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December	2.55%	7.63%	0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EFIV and CPSD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024	0.79

The correlation between EFIV and CPSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EFIV vs. CPSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFIV

EFIV Risk / Return Rank: 76
EFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
EFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 77

CPSD

CPSD Risk / Return Rank: 94
CPSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CPSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CPSD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CPSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CPSD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFIV vs. CPSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFIV	CPSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	3.26	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	5.18	-1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.72	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	6.19	-2.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.02	30.66	-15.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFIV vs. CPSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the CPSD Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFIV and CPSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFIV	CPSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	3.26	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	2.03	-0.96

Drawdowns

EFIV vs. CPSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, which is greater than CPSD's maximum drawdown of -3.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and CPSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFIV	CPSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.52%	-3.45%	-21.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-1.49%	-7.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	0.00%	-1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-0.47%	-4.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	0.30%	+1.74%

Volatility

EFIV vs. CPSD - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December (CPSD) at 0.37%. This indicates that EFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFIV	CPSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	0.37%	+2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	1.58%	+7.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.79%	2.83%	+8.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	3.41%	+13.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.83%	3.41%	+13.42%

EFIV vs. CPSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFIV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CPSD's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFIV vs. CPSD - Dividend Comparison

EFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while CPSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CPSD Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - December	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF	0.94%	1.03%	1.20%	1.37%	1.64%	1.19%	0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFIV and CPSD in my portfolio?

EFIV and CPSD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFIV or CPSD?

EFIV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to CPSD (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFIV dropped -24.52% vs CPSD's -3.45%.

Which ETF is better, EFIV or CPSD?

On 1-year performance, EFIV leads with 30.49% vs 9.16% for CPSD. On fees, EFIV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, CPSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFIV or CPSD?

Over the 1-year period, EFIV has performed better with a 30.49% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFIV or CPSD?

EFIV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFIV or CPSD?

EFIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for CPSD.

What is the main difference between EFIV and CPSD?

EFIV is categorized as S&P 500, while CPSD is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EFIV and 0.69% for CPSD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.