PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFFE vs. DFEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFFE vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFFE achieves a 17.73% return, which is significantly lower than DFEV's 25.45% return.


EFFE

1D
-5.58%
1M
0.23%
YTD
17.73%
6M
18.02%
1Y
30.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFEV

1D
-5.33%
1M
2.00%
YTD
25.45%
6M
26.35%
1Y
48.75%
3Y*
24.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFFE vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EFFE and DFEV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.89

The correlation between EFFE and DFEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFFE vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFFE
EFFE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EFFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFFE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EFFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFFE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEV
DFEV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DFEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFFE vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFFEDFEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

4.31

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.90

15.41

-7.51

EFFE vs. DFEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFFE Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the DFEV Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFFE and DFEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFFE vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFFE drawdown since its inception was -13.75%, smaller than the maximum DFEV drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFFE and DFEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFFEDFEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.75%

-18.49%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-11.35%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.05%

-5.33%

-3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-4.63%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

3.17%

+0.66%

Volatility

EFFE vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE) has a higher volatility of 12.74% compared to Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) at 11.67%. This indicates that EFFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFFEDFEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.74%

11.67%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.67%

18.08%

+2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.67%

20.00%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.46%

17.09%

+4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

17.09%

+4.37%

EFFE vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFFE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFFE vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison

EFFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than DFEV's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.09%2.69%3.17%3.47%3.35%
EFFE
Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF
3.99%4.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFFE and DFEV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFFE has higher volatility (12.74%) compared to DFEV (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFFE dropped -13.75% vs DFEV's -18.49%.

On 1-year performance, DFEV leads with 48.75% vs 30.19% for EFFE. On fees, DFEV is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, DFEV has been the lower-risk option at 11.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 48.75% return vs 30.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFEV is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for EFFE.

EFFE has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 2.09% for DFEV.

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for EFFE and 0.43% for DFEV.

DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFFE and DFEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer