EFAA vs. NIHI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI).

EFAA and NIHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFAA is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Jul 17, 2024. NIHI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Sep 16, 2025.

Performance

EFAA vs. NIHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EFAA vs. NIHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EFAA Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF	0.52%	5.22%
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF	0.34%	5.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAA achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than NIHI's 0.34% return.

EFAA

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -4.14%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: 18.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NIHI

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: -4.42%
• YTD: 0.34%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAA vs. NIHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than NIHI's 0.68% expense ratio.

NIHI

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF

EFAA

Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF

Return for Risk

EFAA vs. NIHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAA

EFAA Risk / Return Rank: 70
EFAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
EFAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EFAA Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EFAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
EFAA Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAA vs. NIHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF (EFAA) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFAA	NIHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.36	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFAA	NIHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	0.70	+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between EFAA and NIHI is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EFAA vs. NIHI - Dividend Comparison

EFAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, more than NIHI's 6.40% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
EFAA Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF	8.29%	7.94%	3.29%
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF	6.40%	3.44%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EFAA vs. NIHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAA drawdown since its inception was -11.97%, which is greater than NIHI's maximum drawdown of -10.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAA and NIHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFAA	NIHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.97%	-10.88%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.06%	-6.28%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	-2.24%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EFAA	NIHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.10%	15.52%	-1.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.91%	15.52%	-2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.91%	15.52%	-2.61%