EEV vs. SOXL
EEV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EEV tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%) while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEV returned -24.12%/yr vs 64.56%/yr for SOXL. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. EEV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
EEV vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEV achieves a -39.72% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 450.61% return. Over the past 10 years, EEV has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of -24.12%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 64.56% annualized return.
EEV
- 1D
- 11.50%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -39.72%
- 6M
- -40.50%
- 1Y
- -56.22%
- 3Y*
- -33.55%
- 5Y*
- -15.31%
- 10Y*
- -24.12%
SOXL
- 1D
- -23.06%
- 1M
- 21.44%
- YTD
- 450.61%
- 6M
- 429.57%
- 1Y
- 976.09%
- 3Y*
- 120.84%
- 5Y*
- 42.16%
- 10Y*
- 64.56%
EEV vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | -39.72% | -43.35% | -8.08% | -13.08% | 37.05% | -4.99% | -48.93% | -30.87% | 24.06% | -49.03% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 450.61% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEV and SOXL is -0.73, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | -0.64 |
The correlation between EEV and SOXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.73 to -0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
EEV vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEV
SOXL
Financial Services
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
EEV
SOXL
-
Technology
EEV
SOXL
Consumer Cyclical
EEV
SOXL
-
Industrials
EEV
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
EEV
SOXL
-
Communication Services
EEV
SOXL
-
Energy
EEV
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
EEV
SOXL
-
Healthcare
EEV
SOXL
-
Utilities
EEV
SOXL
-
Real Estate
EEV
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEV vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
EEV
SOXL
EEV vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEV | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.58 | -0.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 22.69 | -23.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.82 | 72.83 | -74.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEV vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEV drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than SOXL's maximum drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEV and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEV | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.88% | -90.46% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.68% | -43.47% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.51% | -87.88% | +10.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.14% | -90.46% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.47% | -90.46% | -4.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.87% | -23.06% | -76.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.00% | -34.95% | -58.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.75% | 13.52% | +20.23% |
Volatility
EEV vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) is 24.52%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 68.39%. This indicates that EEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEV | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.52% | 68.39% | -43.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.58% | 99.84% | -58.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.86% | 116.79% | -70.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.50% | 110.35% | -70.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.47% | 100.62% | -59.15% |
EEV vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEV vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | 7.17% | 5.40% | 4.45% | 3.45% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.34% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEV and SOXL have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (68.39%) compared to EEV (24.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEV dropped -99.88% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 64.56% vs -24.12% for EEV. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EEV has been the lower-risk option at 24.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 64.56% return vs -24.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EEV.
EEV has the higher dividend yield at 7.17%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.
EEV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EEV and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.45 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEV and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer