PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEV vs. DFAE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEV vs. DFAE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEV achieves a -43.39% return, which is significantly lower than DFAE's 27.92% return.


EEV

1D
-2.01%
1M
-19.28%
YTD
-43.39%
6M
-45.57%
1Y
-61.13%
3Y*
-34.76%
5Y*
-16.31%
10Y*
-24.30%

DFAE

1D
0.73%
1M
8.96%
YTD
27.92%
6M
30.63%
1Y
54.94%
3Y*
24.30%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEV vs. DFAE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
-43.39%-43.35%-8.08%-13.08%37.05%-4.99%-9.69%
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
27.92%31.48%7.68%12.63%-17.52%3.53%4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EEV and DFAE is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

-0.98

The correlation between EEV and DFAE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEV vs. DFAE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEV
DFAE

Technology

43.6%
34.8%

Financial Services

17.5%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
9.1%

Industrials

6.2%
10.2%

Basic Materials

6.1%
7.7%

Communication Services

5.7%
6.1%

Energy

3.3%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
3.3%

Healthcare

2.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.0%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.5%

Technology

EEV
43.6%
DFAE
34.8%

Financial Services

EEV
17.5%
DFAE
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EEV
8.1%
DFAE
9.1%

Industrials

EEV
6.2%
DFAE
10.2%

Basic Materials

EEV
6.1%
DFAE
7.7%

Communication Services

EEV
5.7%
DFAE
6.1%

Energy

EEV
3.3%
DFAE
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

EEV
2.7%
DFAE
3.3%

Healthcare

EEV
2.5%
DFAE
3.5%

Utilities

EEV
2.0%
DFAE
2.4%

Real Estate

EEV
0.9%
DFAE
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEV vs. DFAE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEV
EEV Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
EEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEV Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEV Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAE
DFAE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DFAE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEV vs. DFAE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEVDFAEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.52

2.92

-4.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.78

3.74

-6.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.68

1.54

-0.85

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.01

4.40

-5.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.80

17.09

-18.89

EEV vs. DFAE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEV Sharpe Ratio is -1.52, which is lower than the DFAE Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEV and DFAE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEVDFAEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.52

2.92

-4.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

0.53

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.48

0.65

-1.13

Drawdowns

EEV vs. DFAE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEV drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, which is greater than DFAE's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEV and DFAE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEVDFAEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.87%

-32.21%

-67.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.96%

-12.80%

-48.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.45%

-18.12%

-58.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.25%

-32.19%

-48.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.87%

0.00%

-99.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.00%

-10.33%

-82.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.18%

3.30%

+30.88%

Volatility

EEV vs. DFAE - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) has a higher volatility of 17.29% compared to Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) at 7.97%. This indicates that EEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEVDFAEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.29%

7.97%

+9.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.49%

16.47%

+19.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.29%

18.95%

+21.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.24%

17.81%

+20.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.13%

17.84%

+23.29%

EEV vs. DFAE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEV vs. DFAE - Dividend Comparison

EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, more than DFAE's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
1.71%2.20%2.35%2.43%2.85%1.63%0.01%0.00%0.00%
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
7.64%5.40%4.45%3.45%0.27%0.00%0.14%1.34%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEV and DFAE have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEV has higher volatility (17.29%) compared to DFAE (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEV dropped -99.87% vs DFAE's -32.21%.

On 5-year performance, DFAE leads with 9.43% vs -16.31% for EEV. On fees, DFAE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DFAE has been the lower-risk option at 7.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFAE has performed better with a 9.43% return vs -16.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EEV.

EEV has the higher dividend yield at 7.64%, compared with 1.71% for DFAE.

EEV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DFAE is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EEV and 0.35% for DFAE.

DFAE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEV and DFAE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer