EETH vs. YBTC
EETH (ProShares Ether Strategy ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EETH returned -28.52% vs -35.71% for YBTC. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EETH vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EETH achieves a -36.80% return, which is significantly lower than YBTC's -23.39% return.
EETH
- 1D
- -4.54%
- 1M
- -17.53%
- YTD
- -36.80%
- 6M
- -37.26%
- 1Y
- -28.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YBTC
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -16.32%
- YTD
- -23.39%
- 6M
- -26.70%
- 1Y
- -35.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EETH vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | -36.80% | -17.19% | 27.04% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -23.39% | -4.23% | 58.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between EETH and YBTC is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2024 | 0.74 |
The correlation between EETH and YBTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EETH vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank
EETH
YBTC
EETH vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EETH | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | -0.91 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | -1.22 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.85 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | -0.76 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | -1.39 | +0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EETH | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | -0.91 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.16 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
EETH vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EETH drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than YBTC's maximum drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EETH and YBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EETH | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -47.09% | -19.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.71% | -47.09% | -15.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.06% | -44.06% | -18.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.40% | -12.89% | -16.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.55% | 25.69% | +12.86% |
Volatility
EETH vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) has a higher volatility of 9.31% compared to Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) at 8.85%. This indicates that EETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EETH | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.31% | 8.85% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.84% | 31.81% | +15.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.60% | 39.20% | +29.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.89% | 40.81% | +28.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.89% | 40.81% | +28.08% |
EETH vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EETH and YBTC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EETH vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison
EETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.06%, less than YBTC's 88.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | 84.06% | 56.98% | 10.82% | 0.52% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 88.13% | 76.04% | 44.53% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EETH and YBTC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EETH has higher volatility (9.31%) compared to YBTC (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EETH dropped -66.86% vs YBTC's -47.09%.
On 1-year performance, EETH leads with -28.52% vs -35.71% for YBTC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EETH has performed better with a -28.52% return vs -35.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EETH and YBTC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.13%, compared with 84.06% for EETH.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill.
EETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.42 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EETH and YBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer