EETH vs. YBTC
EETH (ProShares Ether Strategy ETF) and YBTC (Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EETH returned -49.03% vs -40.21% for YBTC. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EETH vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EETH achieves a -38.56% return, which is significantly lower than YBTC's -23.96% return.
EETH
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 9.70%
- 6M
- -31.24%
- YTD
- -38.56%
- 1Y
- -49.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.00%
YBTC
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- 6M
- -20.57%
- YTD
- -23.96%
- 1Y
- -40.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $666.61K | $697.40K | $772.42K | |
| $1.21M | $1.11M | $1.55M |
EETH vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | -38.56% | -17.19% | 21.94% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | -23.96% | -4.23% | 55.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between EETH and YBTC is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024 | 0.75 |
The correlation between EETH and YBTC shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EETH vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank
EETH
YBTC
EETH vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EETH | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.81 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.87 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | -1.35 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EETH vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EETH drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, which is greater than YBTC's maximum drawdown of -48.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EETH and YBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EETH | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.22% | -48.84% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.22% | -48.84% | -20.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.12% | -44.47% | -18.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.48% | -14.91% | -16.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.54% | 31.35% | +15.19% |
Volatility
EETH vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) at 7.65%. This indicates that EETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EETH | YBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.16% | 7.65% | +5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.92% | 31.73% | +14.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.62% | 40.25% | +27.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.36% | 40.45% | +27.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.36% | 40.45% | +27.91% |
EETH vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EETH and YBTC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EETH vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison
EETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 86.45%, more than YBTC's 80.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | 73.66% | 56.98% | 10.82% | 0.52% |
YBTC Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | 80.99% | 76.04% | 44.53% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EETH and YBTC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EETH has higher volatility (13.16%) compared to YBTC (7.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EETH dropped -69.22% vs YBTC's -48.84%.
On 1-year performance, YBTC leads with -40.21% vs -49.03% for EETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, YBTC has been the lower-risk option at 7.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YBTC has performed better with a -40.21% return vs -49.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EETH and YBTC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 80.99%, compared with 73.66% for EETH.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill.
EETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.78 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EETH and YBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer