EEOFX vs. MMGPX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX).

EEOFX is managed by Pear Tree Funds. It was launched on Sep 1, 2017. MMGPX is managed by Morgan Stanley. It was launched on Apr 30, 2017.

Performance

EEOFX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EEOFX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund	-3.10%	23.55%	1.32%	-1.53%	-27.88%	10.83%	62.80%	25.43%	-15.79%	3.20%
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio	-14.93%	12.58%	41.83%	44.34%	-81.34%	-11.55%	152.67%	40.20%	10.89%	5.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEOFX achieves a -3.10% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -14.93% return.

EEOFX

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: -10.37%
• YTD: -3.10%
• 6M: -2.37%
• 1Y: 30.07%
• 3Y*: 4.13%
• 5Y*: -1.95%
• 10Y*: —

MMGPX

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -9.08%
• YTD: -14.93%
• 6M: -23.43%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: 19.10%
• 5Y*: -19.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEOFX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEOFX has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.

EEOFX

Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund

MMGPX

Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio

Return for Risk

EEOFX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEOFX

EEOFX Risk / Return Rank: 65
EEOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EEOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EEOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EEOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
EEOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

MMGPX

MMGPX Risk / Return Rank: 7
MMGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
MMGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
MMGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
MMGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MMGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEOFX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EEOFX	MMGPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.10	+1.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	0.38	+1.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.05	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	-0.02	+1.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.20	-0.05	+5.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EEOFX vs. MMGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEOFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the MMGPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEOFX and MMGPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EEOFX	MMGPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	0.10	+1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	-0.44	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.14	+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between EEOFX and MMGPX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EEOFX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison

EEOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than MMGPX's 0.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EEOFX Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund	0.07%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	6.63%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio	0.50%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	64.53%	7.93%	15.63%	28.02%

Drawdowns

EEOFX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEOFX drawdown since its inception was -50.17%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -87.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEOFX and MMGPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEOFX	MMGPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.17%	-87.45%	+37.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.49%	-27.79%	+14.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.17%	-86.09%	+35.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.26%	-74.10%	+48.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.83%	-38.69%	+18.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.37%	11.11%	-6.74%

Volatility

EEOFX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) is 6.84%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that EEOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEOFX	MMGPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	7.90%	-1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.26%	21.47%	-5.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.03%	31.90%	-8.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.85%	45.71%	-20.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.70%	39.03%	-14.33%