PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEOFX vs. KMKNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEOFX vs. KMKNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEOFX achieves a 20.74% return, which is significantly higher than KMKNX's 7.47% return.


EEOFX

1D
-0.15%
1M
-6.92%
YTD
20.74%
6M
18.11%
1Y
42.43%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*

KMKNX

1D
0.13%
1M
-8.53%
YTD
7.47%
6M
5.87%
1Y
-0.73%
3Y*
31.90%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
19.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEOFX vs. KMKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEOFX
Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund
20.74%23.55%1.32%-1.53%-27.88%10.83%62.80%25.43%-15.79%3.20%
KMKNX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class
7.47%-3.09%84.05%-7.34%14.98%28.03%19.56%22.76%-10.68%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EEOFX and KMKNX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2017

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEOFX vs. KMKNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEOFX
EEOFX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EEOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
EEOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

KMKNX
KMKNX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KMKNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMKNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMKNX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
KMKNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMKNX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEOFX vs. KMKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEOFXKMKNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.01

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

-0.07

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

-0.18

+9.70

EEOFX vs. KMKNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEOFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the KMKNX Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEOFX and KMKNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEOFX vs. KMKNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEOFX drawdown since its inception was -50.17%, smaller than the maximum KMKNX drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEOFX and KMKNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEOFXKMKNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.17%

-65.47%

+15.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.49%

-20.13%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.32%

-28.27%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.17%

-31.47%

-18.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.28%

-21.18%

+12.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-15.29%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

8.05%

-3.65%

Volatility

EEOFX vs. KMKNX - Volatility Comparison

Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund (EEOFX) has a higher volatility of 10.75% compared to Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) at 7.06%. This indicates that EEOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMKNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEOFXKMKNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.75%

7.06%

+3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.92%

19.60%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.15%

23.79%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.30%

26.50%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.91%

23.70%

+1.21%

EEOFX vs. KMKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEOFX has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than KMKNX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEOFX vs. KMKNX - Dividend Comparison

EEOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than KMKNX's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEOFX
Essex Environmental Opportunities Fund
0.05%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.01%6.63%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KMKNX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class
0.61%0.66%0.81%0.87%1.36%1.56%0.26%0.33%9.13%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEOFX and KMKNX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEOFX has higher volatility (10.75%) compared to KMKNX (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEOFX dropped -50.17% vs KMKNX's -65.47%.

EEOFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEOFX and KMKNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer