EEMX vs. GEME

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

EEMX (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and GEME (Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EEMX is passively managed, while GEME is actively managed. Over the past year, EEMX returned 39.11% vs 56.59% for GEME. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EEMX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GEME.

Performance

EEMX vs. GEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMX achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly lower than GEME's 28.05% return.

EEMX

• 1D: -3.71%
• 1M: -4.56%
• 6M: 13.01%
• YTD: 19.72%
• 1Y: 39.11%
• 3Y*: 20.28%
• 5Y*: 7.17%
• 10Y*: —

GEME

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: -4.46%
• 6M: 21.67%
• YTD: 28.05%
• 1Y: 56.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMX vs. GEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF	19.72%	32.97%
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	28.05%	37.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMX and GEME is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025	0.91

The correlation between EEMX and GEME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EEMX vs. GEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMX

EEMX Risk / Return Rank: 64
EEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
EEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
EEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
EEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

GEME

GEME Risk / Return Rank: 88
GEME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GEME Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GEME Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GEME Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GEME Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMX vs. GEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEMX	GEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	2.42	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.95	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.43	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	4.23	-1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.92	14.64	-4.72

EEMX vs. GEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the GEME Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMX and GEME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEMX vs. GEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMX drawdown since its inception was -39.90%, which is greater than GEME's maximum drawdown of -16.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMX and GEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMX	GEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.90%	-16.86%	-23.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	-13.46%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.45%	-8.70%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.63%	-2.50%	-12.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.95%	3.88%	+0.07%

Volatility

EEMX vs. GEME - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EEMX) has a higher volatility of 11.67% compared to Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) at 9.24%. This indicates that EEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GEME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMX	GEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.67%	9.24%	+2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.48%	20.97%	+1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.46%	23.54%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.01%	24.03%	-4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.69%	24.03%	-3.34%

EEMX vs. GEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GEME's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEMX vs. GEME - Dividend Comparison

EEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than GEME's 5.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EEMX SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets Fossil Fuel Free ETF	1.88%	2.28%	2.26%	2.20%	2.38%	1.72%	1.42%	2.57%	2.41%	2.45%	0.15%
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF	5.47%	7.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMX and GEME in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, EEMX and GEME move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EEMX or GEME?

EEMX has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to GEME (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMX dropped -39.90% vs GEME's -16.86%.

Which ETF is better, EEMX or GEME?

On 1-year performance, GEME leads with 56.59% vs 39.11% for EEMX. On fees, EEMX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, GEME has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEMX or GEME?

Over the 1-year period, GEME has performed better with a 56.59% return vs 39.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMX or GEME?

EEMX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMX or GEME?

GEME has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 1.88% for EEMX.

What is the main difference between EEMX and GEME?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacific AM. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EEMX and 0.75% for GEME.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GEME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.