PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMV vs. VEXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMV vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 12.46% return, which is significantly lower than VEXC's 17.29% return.


EEMV

1D
-0.38%
1M
-2.94%
6M
7.78%
YTD
12.46%
1Y
18.06%
3Y*
11.41%
5Y*
5.62%
10Y*
5.71%
ALL TIME*
5.22%

VEXC

1D
1.25%
1M
-2.53%
6M
11.04%
YTD
17.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.28M$14.89M$17.73M
$2.10M$2.14M$2.87M

EEMV vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EEMV and VEXC is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMV vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEMV
EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VEXC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEMV vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMVVEXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

EEMV vs. VEXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMV vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and VEXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMVVEXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.56%

-12.42%

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.20%

-6.04%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-2.61%

-5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

Volatility

EEMV vs. VEXC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMVVEXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.51%

20.44%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

20.44%

-7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.06%

20.44%

-6.38%

EEMV vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EEMV vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison

EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than VEXC's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
2.27%2.65%3.50%2.75%1.93%2.14%2.45%2.63%2.46%2.34%2.79%2.55%
VEXC
Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.47%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMV and VEXC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.

EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.47% for VEXC.

EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.07% for VEXC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMV and VEXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer