PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMV vs. SOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMV vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 17.74% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 104.57% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMV has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 6.68%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.79% annualized return.


EEMV

1D
-1.04%
1M
7.00%
YTD
17.74%
6M
18.90%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
6.68%

SOXX

1D
1.76%
1M
33.25%
YTD
104.57%
6M
99.43%
1Y
190.05%
3Y*
57.39%
5Y*
34.50%
10Y*
35.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMV vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
17.74%13.45%7.98%7.75%-13.94%5.05%6.90%7.83%-5.81%27.28%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
104.57%40.74%12.92%67.12%-35.09%44.09%52.72%62.42%-6.49%39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMV and SOXX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.58

The correlation between EEMV and SOXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMV vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMV
SOXX

Technology

28.9%
100.0%

Financial Services

17.7%

-

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.8%

-

Industrials

6.7%

-

Healthcare

6.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%

-

Utilities

4.6%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Technology

EEMV
28.9%
SOXX
100.0%

Financial Services

EEMV
17.7%
SOXX

-

Communication Services

EEMV
11.2%
SOXX

-

Consumer Defensive

EEMV
6.8%
SOXX

-

Industrials

EEMV
6.7%
SOXX

-

Healthcare

EEMV
6.2%
SOXX

-

Consumer Cyclical

EEMV
5.0%
SOXX

-

Utilities

EEMV
4.6%
SOXX

-

Energy

EEMV
3.4%
SOXX

-

Basic Materials

EEMV
3.1%
SOXX

-

Real Estate

EEMV
0.5%
SOXX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMV vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMV
EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMV vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMVSOXXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

5.61

-3.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

5.36

-2.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.74

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

12.13

-9.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.79

46.43

-35.64

EEMV vs. SOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the SOXX Sharpe Ratio of 5.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMV and SOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMVSOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

5.61

-3.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.96

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

1.07

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.45

-0.06

Drawdowns

EEMV vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and SOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMVSOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.56%

-70.21%

+38.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-15.77%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.47%

-41.36%

+28.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-45.75%

+23.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

-45.75%

+14.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

0.00%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-19.97%

+12.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

4.11%

-1.64%

Volatility

EEMV vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) is 5.78%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that EEMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMVSOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

14.03%

-8.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

27.35%

-15.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.06%

34.18%

-21.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.85%

36.11%

-24.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.86%

33.43%

-19.57%

EEMV vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMV vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison

EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
2.25%2.65%3.50%2.75%1.93%2.14%2.45%2.63%2.46%2.34%2.79%2.55%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.27%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMV and SOXX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXX has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to EEMV (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs SOXX's -70.21%.

On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.79% vs 6.68% for EEMV. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EEMV has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.79% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SOXX.

EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.

EEMV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.34% for SOXX.

SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMV and SOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer