EEMV vs. INDY
EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and INDY (iShares India 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while INDY is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Nifty 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMV returned 6.81%/yr vs 6.94%/yr for INDY. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INDY.
Performance
EEMV vs. INDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than INDY's -12.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EEMV having a 6.81% annualized return and INDY not far ahead at 6.94%.
EEMV
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 16.76%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.12%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
INDY
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- -12.36%
- 6M
- -12.66%
- 1Y
- -12.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 6.94%
EEMV vs. INDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 16.76% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | -12.36% | 4.97% | 3.47% | 16.88% | -7.31% | 19.43% | 10.01% | 9.99% | -4.32% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMV and INDY is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EEMV and INDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
EEMV vs. INDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMV
INDY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
EEMV
INDY
Financial Services
EEMV
INDY
Communication Services
EEMV
INDY
Industrials
EEMV
INDY
Consumer Cyclical
EEMV
INDY
Consumer Defensive
EEMV
INDY
Healthcare
EEMV
INDY
Utilities
EEMV
INDY
Energy
EEMV
INDY
Basic Materials
EEMV
INDY
Real Estate
EEMV
INDY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMV vs. INDY — Risk / Return Rank
EEMV
INDY
EEMV vs. INDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and iShares India 50 ETF (INDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMV | INDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.87 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | -0.64 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | -1.35 | +10.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMV vs. INDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum INDY drawdown of -44.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and INDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMV | INDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.56% | -44.74% | +13.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.22% | -18.95% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.47% | -22.40% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -22.40% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -43.50% | +11.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -18.17% | +14.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -12.24% | +4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 8.98% | -6.41% |
Volatility
EEMV vs. INDY - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to iShares India 50 ETF (INDY) at 4.06%. This indicates that EEMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMV | INDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.95% | 4.06% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.17% | 12.55% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.25% | 14.36% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.36% | 14.98% | -2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 19.53% | -5.56% |
EEMV vs. INDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than INDY's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMV vs. INDY - Dividend Comparison
EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than INDY's 9.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.19% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | 9.50% | 8.11% | 0.24% | 0.38% | 3.75% | 7.12% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.27% | 0.48% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMV and INDY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMV has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to INDY (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs INDY's -44.74%.
On 10-year performance, INDY leads with 6.94% vs 6.81% for EEMV. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, INDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, INDY has performed better with a 6.94% return vs 6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INDY.
INDY has the higher dividend yield at 9.50%, compared with 2.19% for EEMV.
EEMV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while INDY is Emerging Markets Equities. EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while INDY tracks Nifty 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.65% for INDY.
EEMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMV and INDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer