EEMV vs. GPIX

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. EEMV is passively managed, while GPIX is actively managed. Over the past year, EEMV returned 27.78% vs 25.72% for GPIX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.

Performance

EEMV vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 20.09% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 10.28% return.

EEMV

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: 7.71%
• YTD: 20.09%
• 6M: 21.21%
• 1Y: 27.78%
• 3Y*: 14.32%
• 5Y*: 6.38%
• 10Y*: 7.04%

GPIX

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 6M: 10.95%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMV vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	20.09%	13.45%	7.98%	10.13%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	10.28%	16.25%	21.77%	13.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMV and GPIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	0.59

The correlation between EEMV and GPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMV vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEMV	GPIX
Technology	36.5%	39.2%
Financial Services	18.0%	10.9%
Communication Services	10.1%	10.7%
Industrials	6.6%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	4.4%
Healthcare	5.4%	8.3%
Utilities	4.4%	2.2%
Energy	3.6%	3.2%
Basic Materials	2.9%	1.7%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.8%

Return for Risk

EEMV vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMV

EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 66
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 65

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 83
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMV vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEMV	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.42	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	3.30	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.46	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	3.35	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.90	16.40	-5.50

EEMV vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMV and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEMV vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMV	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.56%	-17.50%	-14.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.22%	-7.71%	-1.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.14%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-1.48%	-6.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	1.57%	+0.99%

Volatility

EEMV vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 4.00%. This indicates that EEMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMV	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.16%	4.00%	+4.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.51%	8.63%	+4.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.67%	10.69%	+3.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.22%	13.88%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.99%	13.88%	+0.11%

EEMV vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEMV vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than GPIX's 7.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	3.07%	2.65%	3.50%	2.75%	1.93%	2.14%	2.45%	2.63%	2.46%	2.34%	2.79%	2.55%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	7.97%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMV and GPIX in my portfolio?

EEMV and GPIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEMV or GPIX?

EEMV has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to GPIX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

Which ETF is better, EEMV or GPIX?

On 1-year performance, EEMV leads with 27.78% vs 25.72% for GPIX. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEMV or GPIX?

Over the 1-year period, EEMV has performed better with a 27.78% return vs 25.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMV or GPIX?

EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMV or GPIX?

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.97%, compared with 3.07% for EEMV.

What is the main difference between EEMV and GPIX?

EEMV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.29% for GPIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.