EEMV vs. FXF
EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while FXF is a Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMV returned 7.04%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for FXF. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FXF.
Performance
EEMV vs. FXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 20.09% return, which is significantly higher than FXF's -0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMV has outperformed FXF with an annualized return of 7.04%, while FXF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.05% annualized return.
EEMV
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 20.09%
- 6M
- 21.21%
- 1Y
- 27.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
FXF
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 1.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
EEMV vs. FXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 20.09% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | -0.56% | 14.04% | -7.46% | 9.63% | -2.29% | -4.08% | 8.18% | 0.32% | -2.01% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMV and FXF is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.20 |
The correlation between EEMV and FXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMV vs. FXF — Risk / Return Rank
EEMV
FXF
EEMV vs. FXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMV | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.04 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 0.30 | +2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.90 | 0.64 | +10.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMV vs. FXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum FXF drawdown of -35.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and FXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMV | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.56% | -35.58% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.22% | -4.97% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.47% | -8.52% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -11.99% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -15.04% | -16.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.83% | +18.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -20.83% | +12.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.29% | +0.27% |
Volatility
EEMV vs. FXF - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) at 1.84%. This indicates that EEMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMV | FXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 1.84% | +6.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 5.53% | +7.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 7.42% | +7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.22% | 8.33% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 7.57% | +6.42% |
EEMV vs. FXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FXF's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMV vs. FXF - Dividend Comparison
EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, while FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.07% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMV and FXF have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMV has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to FXF (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs FXF's -35.58%.
On 10-year performance, EEMV leads with 7.04% vs 1.05% for FXF. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FXF has been the lower-risk option at 1.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEMV has performed better with a 7.04% return vs 1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FXF.
EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.00% for FXF.
EEMV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FXF is Currency. EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while FXF tracks Swiss Franc. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.40% for FXF.
EEMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMV and FXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer