PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMV vs. EWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMV vs. EWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly higher than EWX's 10.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMV has underperformed EWX with an annualized return of 5.83%, while EWX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.80% annualized return.


EEMV

1D
-2.96%
1M
-3.04%
6M
9.81%
YTD
13.53%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
11.90%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
5.83%

EWX

1D
-2.88%
1M
-2.19%
6M
6.27%
YTD
10.03%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
8.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMV vs. EWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
13.53%13.45%7.98%7.75%-13.94%5.05%6.90%7.83%-5.81%27.28%
EWX
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF
10.03%15.46%6.81%18.13%-15.00%18.15%14.84%15.59%-18.75%34.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMV and EWX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.87

The correlation between EEMV and EWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMV vs. EWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMV
EWX

Technology

36.5%
16.9%

Financial Services

18.0%
4.8%

Communication Services

10.1%
0.8%

Industrials

6.6%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
2.3%

Healthcare

5.4%
3.3%

Utilities

4.4%
1.3%

Energy

3.6%
1.7%

Basic Materials

2.9%
5.7%

Real Estate

0.6%
2.1%

Technology

EEMV
36.5%
EWX
16.9%

Financial Services

EEMV
18.0%
EWX
4.8%

Communication Services

EEMV
10.1%
EWX
0.8%

Industrials

EEMV
6.6%
EWX
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMV
6.2%
EWX
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

EEMV
5.6%
EWX
2.3%

Healthcare

EEMV
5.4%
EWX
3.3%

Utilities

EEMV
4.4%
EWX
1.3%

Energy

EEMV
3.6%
EWX
1.7%

Basic Materials

EEMV
2.9%
EWX
5.7%

Real Estate

EEMV
0.6%
EWX
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMV vs. EWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMV
EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EWX
EWX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMV vs. EWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMVEWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.20

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.20

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

6.34

+0.13

EEMV vs. EWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the EWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMV and EWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMV vs. EWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum EWX drawdown of -63.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and EWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMVEWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.56%

-63.90%

+32.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-7.98%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.47%

-21.37%

+8.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-24.36%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

-43.00%

+11.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.32%

-6.23%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-13.11%

+5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.76%

-0.04%

Volatility

EEMV vs. EWX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX) have volatilities of 7.90% and 7.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMVEWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.90%

7.80%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.84%

14.89%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

16.68%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.49%

15.64%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.99%

17.19%

-3.20%

EEMV vs. EWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EWX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMV vs. EWX - Dividend Comparison

EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than EWX's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
2.25%2.65%3.50%2.75%1.93%2.14%2.45%2.63%2.46%2.34%2.79%2.55%
EWX
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF
2.57%2.91%2.90%2.32%3.00%2.77%2.24%2.73%3.26%2.30%2.46%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMV and EWX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMV has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to EWX (7.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs EWX's -63.90%.

On 10-year performance, EWX leads with 8.80% vs 5.83% for EEMV. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EWX has been the lower-risk option at 7.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWX has performed better with a 8.80% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EWX.

EWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.25% for EEMV.

EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while EWX tracks S&P Emerging Markets Under USD2 Billion Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.65% for EWX.

EEMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMV and EWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer