EEMV vs. ESGV
EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and ESGV (Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while ESGV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the FTSE US All Cap Choice Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEMV returned 6.38%/yr vs 12.57%/yr for ESGV. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ESGV.
Performance
EEMV vs. ESGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 20.09% return, which is significantly higher than ESGV's 10.76% return.
EEMV
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 20.09%
- 6M
- 21.21%
- 1Y
- 27.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
ESGV
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- —
EEMV vs. ESGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 20.09% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -3.36% |
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | 10.76% | 16.48% | 24.69% | 30.79% | -24.04% | 26.55% | 25.69% | 33.36% | -14.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMV and ESGV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018 | 0.65 |
The correlation between EEMV and ESGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EEMV vs. ESGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMV
ESGV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
EEMV
ESGV
Financial Services
EEMV
ESGV
Communication Services
EEMV
ESGV
Industrials
EEMV
ESGV
Consumer Cyclical
EEMV
ESGV
Consumer Defensive
EEMV
ESGV
Healthcare
EEMV
ESGV
Utilities
EEMV
ESGV
Energy
EEMV
ESGV
Basic Materials
EEMV
ESGV
Real Estate
EEMV
ESGV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMV vs. ESGV — Risk / Return Rank
EEMV
ESGV
EEMV vs. ESGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMV | ESGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.43 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.90 | 10.21 | +0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMV vs. ESGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum ESGV drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and ESGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMV | ESGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.56% | -33.66% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.22% | -11.60% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.47% | -20.41% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -28.81% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.87% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -6.41% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.75% | -0.19% |
Volatility
EEMV vs. ESGV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) at 5.34%. This indicates that EEMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMV | ESGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 5.34% | +2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 11.13% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 13.99% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.22% | 18.45% | -6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 20.60% | -6.61% |
EEMV vs. ESGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EEMV vs. ESGV - Dividend Comparison
EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than ESGV's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.07% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | 0.85% | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.42% | 0.95% | 1.11% | 1.27% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMV and ESGV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMV has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to ESGV (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs ESGV's -33.66%.
On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 12.57% vs 6.38% for EEMV. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ESGV has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 12.57% return vs 6.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.
EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.85% for ESGV.
EEMV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ESGV is Large Cap Blend Equities. EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.09% for ESGV.
ESGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMV and ESGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer