EEMD vs. QAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT).

EEMD and QAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EEMD is a passively managed fund by Advisors Asset Management that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield. It was launched on Nov 28, 2017. QAT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014. Both EEMD and QAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EEMD vs. QAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EEMD vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	9.61%	17.60%	-11.21%	5.54%	-0.35%	12.55%	-14.57%	5.00%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	-1.16%	8.81%	5.20%	2.72%	-7.23%	14.42%	6.94%	-0.44%	20.03%	16.81%

Returns By Period

EEMD

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QAT

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -4.42%
• YTD: -1.16%
• 6M: -3.61%
• 1Y: 8.10%
• 3Y*: 5.46%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: 3.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMD vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.

QAT

iShares MSCI Qatar ETF

EEMD

AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF

Return for Risk

EEMD vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QAT

QAT Risk / Return Rank: 31
QAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
QAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
QAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
QAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
QAT Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMD vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EEMD	QAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.07	—

Correlation

The correlation between EEMD and QAT is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EEMD vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison

EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.03%	8.41%	7.66%	6.34%	3.84%	5.35%	4.91%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF	3.55%	3.51%	5.90%	3.92%	4.78%	2.33%	2.63%	3.57%	4.63%	4.10%	3.51%	4.49%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMD	QAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-45.21%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-13.45%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.29%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EEMD	QAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.22%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	14.84%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.60%	—