EEMD vs. EMOP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EEMD (AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF) and EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EEMD is passively managed, while EMOP is actively managed. EEMD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for EMOP.

Performance

EEMD vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EEMD

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMOP

• 1D: -4.78%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 27.21%
• 6M: 28.58%
• 1Y: 47.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMD vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	27.21%	16.48%

EEMD vs. EMOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEMD	EMOP
Utilities	11.3%	2.8%
Energy	10.6%	2.6%
Real Estate	9.8%	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.7%	1.4%
Healthcare	9.5%	1.6%
Communication Services	9.1%	12.3%
Financial Services	9.0%	24.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	7.8%
Industrials	8.2%	8.1%
Basic Materials	7.4%	7.0%
Technology	6.6%	30.3%

Return for Risk

EEMD vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EMOP

EMOP Risk / Return Rank: 76
EMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMD vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEMD	EMOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.21	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.81	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.41	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.72	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.88	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMD	EMOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-12.88%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-4.78%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.00%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EEMD	EMOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	21.65%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.57%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.57%	—

EEMD vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEMD vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison

EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.03%	8.41%	7.66%	6.34%	3.84%	5.35%	4.91%	0.42%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.85%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, EEMD or EMOP?

On fees, EEMD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEMD or EMOP?

EEMD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEMD or EMOP?

EMOP has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for EEMD.

What is the main difference between EEMD and EMOP?

They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EEMD and 0.70% for EMOP.