EEMA vs. SOXX
EEMA (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMA returned 9.49%/yr vs 34.00%/yr for SOXX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
EEMA vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMA achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 84.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMA has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 34.00% annualized return.
EEMA
- 1D
- -3.06%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 1Y
- 36.78%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
SOXX
- 1D
- -4.77%
- 1M
- -7.11%
- 6M
- 67.77%
- YTD
- 84.03%
- 1Y
- 125.94%
- 3Y*
- 48.43%
- 5Y*
- 31.11%
- 10Y*
- 34.00%
EEMA vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 18.98% | 33.27% | 10.23% | 6.57% | -21.49% | -4.22% | 25.17% | 18.60% | -15.76% | 43.41% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 84.03% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMA and SOXX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2012 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EEMA and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EEMA vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMA
SOXX
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
EEMA
SOXX
Financial Services
EEMA
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
EEMA
SOXX
-
Industrials
EEMA
SOXX
-
Communication Services
EEMA
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
EEMA
SOXX
-
Healthcare
EEMA
SOXX
-
Energy
EEMA
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
EEMA
SOXX
-
Utilities
EEMA
SOXX
-
Real Estate
EEMA
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMA vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
EEMA
SOXX
EEMA vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMA | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 8.03 | -5.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 25.14 | -16.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMA vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMA drawdown since its inception was -44.18%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMA and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMA | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.18% | -70.21% | +26.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -15.77% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | -41.36% | +21.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.81% | -45.75% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.18% | -45.75% | +1.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.21% | -15.48% | +7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -19.92% | +6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 5.03% | -0.88% |
Volatility
EEMA vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) is 10.02%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.50%. This indicates that EEMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMA | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.02% | 22.50% | -12.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.70% | 36.44% | -15.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.20% | 42.11% | -18.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 37.77% | -16.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 34.27% | -13.22% |
EEMA vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMA vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
EEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 1.38% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.19% | 1.15% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 1.74% | 1.74% | 2.44% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMA and SOXX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (22.50%) compared to EEMA (10.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMA dropped -44.18% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 34.00% vs 9.49% for EEMA. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, EEMA has been the lower-risk option at 10.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 34.00% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EEMA.
EEMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.
EEMA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. EEMA tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EEMA and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMA and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer