EEMA vs. INDY
EEMA (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF) and INDY (iShares India 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index, while INDY is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Nifty 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMA returned 10.73%/yr vs 6.94%/yr for INDY. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEMA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INDY.
Performance
EEMA vs. INDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMA achieves a 23.06% return, which is significantly higher than INDY's -12.36% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMA has outperformed INDY with an annualized return of 10.73%, while INDY has yielded a comparatively lower 6.94% annualized return.
EEMA
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 23.06%
- 6M
- 24.51%
- 1Y
- 46.13%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
INDY
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- -12.36%
- 6M
- -12.66%
- 1Y
- -12.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 6.94%
EEMA vs. INDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 23.06% | 33.27% | 10.23% | 6.57% | -21.49% | -4.22% | 25.17% | 18.60% | -15.76% | 43.41% |
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | -12.36% | 4.97% | 3.47% | 16.88% | -7.31% | 19.43% | 10.01% | 9.99% | -4.32% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMA and INDY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2012 | 0.63 |
The correlation between EEMA and INDY shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EEMA vs. INDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMA
INDY
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
EEMA
INDY
Financial Services
EEMA
INDY
Consumer Cyclical
EEMA
INDY
Industrials
EEMA
INDY
Communication Services
EEMA
INDY
Basic Materials
EEMA
INDY
Healthcare
EEMA
INDY
Energy
EEMA
INDY
Consumer Defensive
EEMA
INDY
Utilities
EEMA
INDY
Real Estate
EEMA
INDY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMA vs. INDY — Risk / Return Rank
EEMA
INDY
EEMA vs. INDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) and iShares India 50 ETF (INDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMA | INDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.87 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | -0.64 | +3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.74 | -1.35 | +13.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMA vs. INDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMA drawdown since its inception was -44.18%, roughly equal to the maximum INDY drawdown of -44.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMA and INDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMA | INDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.18% | -44.74% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -18.95% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | -22.40% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.46% | -22.40% | -18.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.18% | -43.50% | -0.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.06% | -18.17% | +13.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.93% | -12.24% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 8.98% | -5.04% |
Volatility
EEMA vs. INDY - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to iShares India 50 ETF (INDY) at 4.06%. This indicates that EEMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMA | INDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.69% | 4.06% | +7.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.09% | 12.55% | +7.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.62% | 14.36% | +8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 14.98% | +5.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 19.53% | +1.51% |
EEMA vs. INDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than INDY's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMA vs. INDY - Dividend Comparison
EEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than INDY's 9.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 1.34% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.19% | 1.15% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 1.74% | 1.74% | 2.44% |
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | 9.50% | 8.11% | 0.24% | 0.38% | 3.75% | 7.12% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.27% | 0.48% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMA and INDY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMA has higher volatility (11.69%) compared to INDY (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMA dropped -44.18% vs INDY's -44.74%.
On 10-year performance, EEMA leads with 10.73% vs 6.94% for INDY. On fees, EEMA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, INDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEMA has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 6.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INDY.
INDY has the higher dividend yield at 9.50%, compared with 1.34% for EEMA.
EEMA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while INDY is Emerging Markets Equities. EEMA tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index, while INDY tracks Nifty 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EEMA and 0.65% for INDY.
EEMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMA and INDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer