EEIP.L vs. CMB1.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EEIP.L (WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc) and CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - EEIP.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR while CMB1.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEIP.L returned 12.55%/yr vs 19.90%/yr for CMB1.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEIP.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CMB1.L.

Performance

EEIP.L vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (EEIP.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEIP.L achieves a 12.77% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 13.57% return.

EEIP.L

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 12.77%
• 6M: 15.86%
• 1Y: 29.85%
• 3Y*: 17.36%
• 5Y*: 12.55%
• 10Y*: —

CMB1.L

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 13.57%
• 6M: 17.25%
• 1Y: 34.15%
• 3Y*: 28.69%
• 5Y*: 19.90%
• 10Y*: 16.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEIP.L vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEIP.L WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc	12.77%	34.46%	-1.80%	12.45%	6.20%	11.06%	-13.70%	14.22%	-6.64%	13.88%
CMB1.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)	13.57%	43.83%	13.25%	30.68%	-3.56%	18.29%	1.52%	24.83%	-12.74%	21.01%

Correlation

The correlation between EEIP.L and CMB1.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2016	0.80

The correlation between EEIP.L and CMB1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEIP.L vs. CMB1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEIP.L	CMB1.L
Financial Services	24.1%	45.1%
Utilities	17.3%	17.2%
Industrials	15.0%	10.8%
Energy	12.5%	8.8%
Communication Services	8.5%	1.1%
Basic Materials	8.0%	0.6%
Real Estate	4.8%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	10.0%
Healthcare	2.9%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	0.5%
Technology	1.4%	4.6%

Return for Risk

EEIP.L vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEIP.L

EEIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
EEIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EEIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EEIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EEIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EEIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

CMB1.L

CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 67
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEIP.L vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (EEIP.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EEIP.L	CMB1.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	2.26	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	3.07	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.40	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	3.30	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.81	12.01	+2.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EEIP.L vs. CMB1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEIP.L and CMB1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EEIP.L	CMB1.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	2.26	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	1.11	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.47	+0.09

Drawdowns

EEIP.L vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.51%, smaller than the maximum CMB1.L drawdown of -47.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEIP.L and CMB1.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEIP.L	CMB1.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.51%	-47.37%	+12.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.92%	-10.32%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.00%	-15.62%	+4.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.49%	-24.19%	+9.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-0.72%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.49%	-8.80%	+3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	2.84%	-0.83%

Volatility

EEIP.L vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (EEIP.L) is 3.23%, while iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that EEIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEIP.L	CMB1.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.23%	4.47%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.80%	12.15%	-3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.05%	15.06%	-4.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.20%	18.00%	-4.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.14%	19.52%	-4.38%

EEIP.L vs. CMB1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEIP.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CMB1.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEIP.L vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EEIP.L nor CMB1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEIP.L and CMB1.L in my portfolio?

EEIP.L and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EEIP.L or CMB1.L?

On fees, EEIP.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEIP.L or CMB1.L?

EEIP.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CMB1.L.

What is the main difference between EEIP.L and CMB1.L?

EEIP.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EEIP.L and 0.33% for CMB1.L.