EEIIX vs. IMCDX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX).

EEIIX is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Nov 27, 2009. IMCDX is managed by Voya. It was launched on Aug 8, 2012.

Performance

EEIIX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EEIIX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEIIX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I	-1.77%	26.00%	-0.97%	13.95%	-11.53%	-7.57%	5.00%	23.01%	-8.11%	16.45%
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.44%	8.51%	-13.79%	0.08%	8.35%	13.65%	-1.77%	9.40%

Returns By Period

EEIIX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -7.13%
• YTD: -1.77%
• 6M: 3.94%
• 1Y: 17.39%
• 3Y*: 9.60%
• 5Y*: 4.36%
• 10Y*: 4.97%

IMCDX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEIIX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEIIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio.

EEIIX

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I

IMCDX

Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund

Return for Risk

EEIIX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEIIX

EEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 94
EEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
EEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
EEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEIIX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EEIIX	IMCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.28	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EEIIX	IMCDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between EEIIX and IMCDX is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EEIIX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison

EEIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.84%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEIIX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I	10.84%	10.36%	11.46%	11.62%	13.71%	11.49%	10.06%	13.31%	10.80%	9.04%	11.27%	12.21%
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	4.08%	4.21%	3.80%	6.14%	4.64%	4.99%	5.30%	4.79%	5.22%	5.11%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EEIIX	IMCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.20%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EEIIX	IMCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.68%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.95%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.38%	—	—