PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEIIX vs. EIDOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EEIIX vs. EIDOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EEIIX vs. EIDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEIIX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I
-1.77%26.00%-0.97%13.95%-11.53%-7.57%5.00%23.01%-8.11%16.45%
EIDOX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I
1.43%15.59%14.78%11.40%-6.25%1.52%7.39%18.25%-4.28%12.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEIIX achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly lower than EIDOX's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, EEIIX has underperformed EIDOX with an annualized return of 4.97%, while EIDOX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.71% annualized return.


EEIIX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-7.13%
YTD
-1.77%
6M
3.94%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
4.97%

EIDOX

1D
-0.65%
1M
-3.19%
YTD
1.43%
6M
6.73%
1Y
14.99%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
7.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EEIIX vs. EIDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEIIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than EIDOX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EEIIX vs. EIDOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEIIX
EEIIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EEIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EEIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EIDOX
EIDOX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
EIDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
EIDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEIIX vs. EIDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEIIXEIDOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.67

4.16

-1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.64

5.72

-2.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

2.03

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

3.85

-1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.28

15.67

-4.39

EEIIX vs. EIDOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is lower than the EIDOX Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEIIX and EIDOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEIIXEIDOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

4.16

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.67

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

1.63

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.65

-1.26

Correlation

The correlation between EEIIX and EIDOX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EEIIX vs. EIDOX - Dividend Comparison

EEIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.84%, less than EIDOX's 11.13% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEIIX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I
10.84%10.36%11.46%11.62%13.71%11.49%10.06%13.31%10.80%9.04%11.27%12.21%
EIDOX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I
11.13%9.41%8.52%8.97%9.13%7.82%7.66%7.81%8.10%7.85%4.10%0.00%

Drawdowns

EEIIX vs. EIDOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEIIX drawdown since its inception was -31.11%, which is greater than EIDOX's maximum drawdown of -19.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEIIX and EIDOX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EEIIXEIDOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.11%

-19.06%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-3.56%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.28%

-17.42%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.05%

-19.06%

-8.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.20%

-3.56%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-2.50%

-6.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

0.88%

+0.66%

Volatility

EEIIX vs. EIDOX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class I (EEIIX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX) at 1.85%. This indicates that EEIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIDOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EEIIXEIDOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

1.85%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.11%

2.69%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.68%

3.59%

+3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.95%

4.61%

+3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.38%

4.76%

+3.62%