EEDG.L vs. FUSA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EEDG.L (iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and FUSA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EEDG.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUSA.L is a Dividend fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEDG.L returned 13.00%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for FUSA.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EEDG.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FUSA.L.

Performance

EEDG.L vs. FUSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDG.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EEDG.L is traded in GBP, while FUSA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FUSA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEDG.L achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly higher than FUSA.L's 8.45% return.

EEDG.L

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 5.75%
• YTD: 9.66%
• 6M: 9.44%
• 1Y: 26.73%
• 3Y*: 17.59%
• 5Y*: 13.00%
• 10Y*: —

FUSA.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 4.49%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 8.10%
• 1Y: 24.90%
• 3Y*: 15.03%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEDG.L vs. FUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EEDG.L iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	9.66%	7.08%	26.20%	19.31%	-12.31%	29.41%	22.46%
FUSA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	8.45%	8.02%	20.04%	12.14%	0.13%	27.42%	17.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EEDG.L and FUSA.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2020	0.85

The correlation between EEDG.L and FUSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEDG.L vs. FUSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEDG.L	FUSA.L
Technology	35.9%	35.0%
Financial Services	12.0%	12.6%
Communication Services	11.4%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	9.3%
Healthcare	8.6%	9.1%
Industrials	7.8%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.5%
Energy	3.4%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Basic Materials	2.1%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.1%	2.1%

Return for Risk

EEDG.L vs. FUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEDG.L

EEDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
EEDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EEDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
EEDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EEDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
EEDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FUSA.L

FUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEDG.L vs. FUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDG.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EEDG.L	FUSA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.26	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	3.14	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.42	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	4.44	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.58	16.80	-6.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EEDG.L vs. FUSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEDG.L and FUSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EEDG.L	FUSA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.26	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.90	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	0.84	+0.21

Drawdowns

EEDG.L vs. FUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEDG.L drawdown since its inception was -21.95%, smaller than the maximum FUSA.L drawdown of -27.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEDG.L and FUSA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEDG.L	FUSA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.95%	-27.94%	+5.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-5.58%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.95%	-19.20%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	-19.20%	-2.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-3.35%	-0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	1.48%	+1.04%

Volatility

EEDG.L vs. FUSA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDG.L) is 2.65%, while Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that EEDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEDG.L	FUSA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	3.32%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.32%	7.90%	-0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.81%	10.99%	-0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.67%	14.33%	+0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.20%	16.94%	-1.74%

EEDG.L vs. FUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEDG.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FUSA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EEDG.L vs. FUSA.L - Dividend Comparison

EEDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while FUSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EEDG.L iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	0.81%	0.88%	0.99%	1.15%	1.39%	1.00%	1.30%
FUSA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEDG.L and FUSA.L in my portfolio?

EEDG.L and FUSA.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EEDG.L or FUSA.L?

On fees, EEDG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEDG.L or FUSA.L?

EEDG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUSA.L.

What is the main difference between EEDG.L and FUSA.L?

EEDG.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FUSA.L is Dividend. EEDG.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUSA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for EEDG.L and 0.25% for FUSA.L.