EDOC vs. VHT
EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - EDOC tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net while VHT tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOC returned -14.64%/yr vs 4.60%/yr for VHT. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VHT.
Performance
EDOC vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -10.37% return, which is significantly lower than VHT's -0.03% return.
EDOC
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- -10.37%
- 6M
- -12.67%
- 1Y
- -16.13%
- 3Y*
- -8.12%
- 5Y*
- -14.64%
- 10Y*
- —
VHT
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- -0.03%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 19.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
EDOC vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -10.37% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.03% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 9.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC and VHT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EDOC and VHT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
VHT
EDOC vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOC | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.23 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 1.87 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 4.59 | -5.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -39.12% | -26.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -10.40% | -20.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | -16.91% | -18.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.36% | -17.71% | -42.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.31% | -3.20% | -58.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | -5.98% | -37.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.98% | 4.22% | +11.76% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 5.02%. This indicates that EDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 5.02% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.63% | 10.49% | +6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.43% | 14.72% | +7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.46% | 15.03% | +11.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 16.95% | +9.33% |
EDOC vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOC vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than VHT's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC and VHT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDOC has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to VHT (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs VHT's -39.12%.
On 5-year performance, VHT leads with 4.60% vs -14.64% for EDOC. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VHT has performed better with a 4.60% return vs -14.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for EDOC.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.37% for EDOC.
EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.09% for VHT.
VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOC and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer