EDOC vs. FTXH
EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - EDOC tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net while FTXH tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOC returned -12.95%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for FTXH. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXH.
Performance
EDOC vs. FTXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than FTXH's 17.64% return.
EDOC
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 1Y
- -10.31%
- 3Y*
- -6.93%
- 5Y*
- -12.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.16%
FTXH
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 49.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $260.96K | $227.88K | $213.27K | |
| $132.42M | $64.10M | $22.26M |
EDOC vs. FTXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -5.19% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 17.64% | 24.15% | 2.98% | -1.41% | 2.55% | 6.14% | 8.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC and FTXH is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. FTXH — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
FTXH
EDOC vs. FTXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOC | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.48 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 6.65 | -6.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | 19.78 | -20.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. FTXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than FTXH's maximum drawdown of -32.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and FTXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -32.11% | -33.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -7.47% | -23.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.56% | -19.51% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.14% | -19.51% | -39.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.07% | -2.77% | -56.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -5.76% | -37.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.90% | 2.51% | +14.39% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. FTXH - Volatility Comparison
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH) at 4.91%. This indicates that EDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 4.91% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 12.81% | +4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 17.04% | +5.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.67% | 16.53% | +10.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 18.43% | +7.84% |
EDOC vs. FTXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXH's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOC vs. FTXH - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than FTXH's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.10% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC and FTXH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDOC has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to FTXH (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs FTXH's -32.11%.
On 5-year performance, FTXH leads with 9.04% vs -12.95% for EDOC. On fees, FTXH is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTXH has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXH has performed better with a 9.04% return vs -12.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXH is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for EDOC.
FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.26% for EDOC.
EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while FTXH tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Pharmaceuticals Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.60% for FTXH.
FTXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOC and FTXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer