EDOC vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EDOC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EDOC returned -7.95%/yr vs -31.62%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

EDOC vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -3.68% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.

EDOC

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 7.90%
• 6M: -9.14%
• YTD: -3.68%
• 1Y: -10.11%
• 3Y*: -7.95%
• 5Y*: -12.37%
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: 35.86%
• YTD: 24.48%
• 1Y: 64.61%
• 3Y*: -31.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDOC vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF	-3.68%	-0.62%	-2.87%	-12.61%	5.08%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.48%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EDOC and BITI is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.34

Return for Risk

EDOC vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDOC

EDOC Risk / Return Rank: 6
EDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
EDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
EDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 52
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDOC vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDOC	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.45	1.47	-1.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	2.04	-2.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.25	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.33	2.57	-2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.62	6.38	-6.99

EDOC vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDOC Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDOC and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EDOC vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDOC	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.76%	-92.16%	+26.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.71%	-25.28%	-5.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.54%	-84.63%	+49.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.42%	-86.41%	+27.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.36%	-68.40%	+25.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.40%	10.16%	+6.24%

Volatility

EDOC vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) is 7.34%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that EDOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDOC	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.34%	10.76%	-3.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.11%	34.28%	-17.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.57%	44.15%	-21.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.59%	52.24%	-25.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.27%	52.24%	-25.97%

EDOC vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDOC vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than BITI's 15.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.62%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF	0.26%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDOC and BITI in my portfolio?

EDOC and BITI have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDOC or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to EDOC (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, EDOC or BITI?

On 3-year performance, EDOC leads with -7.95% vs -31.62% for BITI. On fees, EDOC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, EDOC has been the lower-risk option at 7.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EDOC or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, EDOC has performed better with a -7.95% return vs -31.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDOC or BITI?

EDOC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EDOC or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 0.26% for EDOC.

What is the main difference between EDOC and BITI?

EDOC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. EDOC tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health Index- TR Net, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.