EDOC vs. ARKG
EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. EDOC is passively managed, while ARKG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOC returned -14.64%/yr vs -16.56%/yr for ARKG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKG.
Performance
EDOC vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -10.37% return, which is significantly lower than ARKG's 24.30% return.
EDOC
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- -10.37%
- 6M
- -12.67%
- 1Y
- -16.13%
- 3Y*
- -8.12%
- 5Y*
- -14.64%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKG
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 17.41%
- YTD
- 24.30%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 52.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.17%
- 5Y*
- -16.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
EDOC vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -10.37% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 24.30% | 23.04% | -28.24% | 16.22% | -53.90% | -33.92% | 74.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC and ARKG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.81 |
The correlation between EDOC and ARKG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
ARKG
EDOC vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOC | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.22 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 1.93 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 4.58 | -5.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and ARKG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -83.59% | +17.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -27.51% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | -51.96% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.36% | -80.18% | +19.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.31% | -67.78% | +6.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | -36.02% | -7.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.98% | 11.53% | +4.45% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. ARKG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) is 7.26%, while ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a volatility of 15.19%. This indicates that EDOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 15.19% | -7.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.63% | 30.91% | -14.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.43% | 42.54% | -20.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.46% | 45.93% | -19.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 41.29% | -15.01% |
EDOC vs. ARKG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOC vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 3.14% | 0.82% | 1.34% |
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC and ARKG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKG has higher volatility (15.19%) compared to EDOC (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs ARKG's -83.59%.
On 5-year performance, EDOC leads with -14.64% vs -16.56% for ARKG. On fees, EDOC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, EDOC has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EDOC has performed better with a -14.64% return vs -16.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDOC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKG.
EDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for ARKG.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.75% for ARKG.
ARKG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOC and ARKG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer