EDOC vs. ARKG
EDOC (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF) and ARKG (ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. EDOC is passively managed, while ARKG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDOC returned -12.95%/yr vs -14.10%/yr for ARKG. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EDOC charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKG.
Performance
EDOC vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDOC achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than ARKG's 36.76% return.
EDOC
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 1Y
- -10.31%
- 3Y*
- -6.93%
- 5Y*
- -12.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.16%
ARKG
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -7.67%
- 6M
- 29.39%
- YTD
- 36.76%
- 1Y
- 68.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- -14.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $89.48M | $114.37M | $122.55M | |
| $260.96K | $227.88K | $213.27K |
EDOC vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | -5.19% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 16.89% |
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 36.76% | 23.04% | -28.24% | 16.22% | -53.90% | -33.92% | 74.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDOC and ARKG is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between EDOC and ARKG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDOC vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank
EDOC
ARKG
EDOC vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EDOC | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.26 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 2.49 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | 5.96 | -6.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EDOC vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDOC drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDOC and ARKG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDOC | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -83.59% | +17.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -27.51% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.56% | -46.45% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.14% | -79.26% | +20.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.07% | -64.55% | +5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -36.28% | -7.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.90% | 11.47% | +5.43% |
Volatility
EDOC vs. ARKG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) is 6.91%, while ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that EDOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDOC | ARKG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 10.89% | -3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 31.22% | -13.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 43.14% | -20.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.67% | 46.21% | -19.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 41.45% | -15.18% |
EDOC vs. ARKG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDOC has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDOC vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison
EDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while ARKG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 3.14% | 0.82% | 1.34% |
EDOC Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EDOC and ARKG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKG has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to EDOC (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDOC dropped -65.76% vs ARKG's -83.59%.
On 5-year performance, EDOC leads with -12.95% vs -14.10% for ARKG. On fees, EDOC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, EDOC has been the lower-risk option at 6.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EDOC has performed better with a -12.95% return vs -14.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EDOC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKG.
EDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for ARKG.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for EDOC and 0.75% for ARKG.
ARKG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EDOC and ARKG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer