PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDMU.DE vs. SXRV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDMU.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDMU.DE achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than SXRV.DE's 20.57% return.


EDMU.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
5.49%
YTD
10.40%
6M
10.34%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*

SXRV.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
9.26%
YTD
20.57%
6M
19.43%
1Y
37.81%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
21.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDMU.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDMU.DE
iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.40%2.64%31.12%22.05%-17.35%38.97%10.90%13.90%
SXRV.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
20.57%6.98%33.55%51.19%-30.05%39.34%34.48%15.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EDMU.DE and SXRV.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.92

The correlation between EDMU.DE and SXRV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDMU.DE vs. SXRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDMU.DE
EDMU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EDMU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDMU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRV.DE
SXRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDMU.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDMU.DESXRV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.75

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.88

11.16

-1.28

EDMU.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDMU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDMU.DE and SXRV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDMU.DESXRV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.40

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.93

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.91

-0.08

Drawdowns

EDMU.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDMU.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, roughly equal to the maximum SXRV.DE drawdown of -32.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDMU.DE and SXRV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDMU.DESXRV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.43%

-32.80%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-10.03%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.12%

-26.69%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

-31.33%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.83%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-6.56%

+1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

3.38%

-1.02%

Volatility

EDMU.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMU.DE) is 2.69%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that EDMU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDMU.DESXRV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

4.26%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.80%

10.98%

-3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

15.67%

-3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

19.84%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

19.65%

-2.26%

EDMU.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDMU.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SXRV.DE's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDMU.DE vs. SXRV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EDMU.DE nor SXRV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, EDMU.DE and SXRV.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EDMU.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDMU.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SXRV.DE.

EDMU.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SXRV.DE is Nasdaq-100. EDMU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Enhanced Focus, while SXRV.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for EDMU.DE and 0.36% for SXRV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDMU.DE and SXRV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer