PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDMJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDMJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDMJ.DE achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly lower than QDVE.DE's 24.06% return.


EDMJ.DE

1D
-0.37%
1M
5.26%
YTD
16.26%
6M
16.64%
1Y
31.02%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*

QDVE.DE

1D
-2.26%
1M
13.91%
YTD
24.06%
6M
23.05%
1Y
49.27%
3Y*
30.81%
5Y*
25.33%
10Y*
26.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDMJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDMJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
16.26%12.89%10.91%15.92%-13.20%9.60%5.87%12.14%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
24.06%9.99%46.12%54.14%-25.83%46.77%29.69%20.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EDMJ.DE and QDVE.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.51

The correlation between EDMJ.DE and QDVE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDMJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDMJ.DE
EDMJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EDMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVE.DE
QDVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDMJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDMJ.DEQDVE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.14

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

8.31

+1.52

EDMJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDMJ.DE and QDVE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDMJ.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.40

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.10

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.07

-0.53

Drawdowns

EDMJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDMJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.95%, smaller than the maximum QDVE.DE drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDMJ.DE and QDVE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDMJ.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.95%

-31.45%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-15.59%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-29.83%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.81%

-29.83%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-3.08%

+2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.13%

-5.80%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

5.91%

-2.76%

Volatility

EDMJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE) is 3.60%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that EDMJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDMJ.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

7.12%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.23%

14.85%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

20.42%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

22.71%

-6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

21.73%

-4.21%

EDMJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EDMJ.DE and QDVE.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EDMJ.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EDMJ.DE nor QDVE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EDMJ.DE and QDVE.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDMJ.DE and QDVE.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

EDMJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while QDVE.DE is Technology Equities. EDMJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus, while QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDMJ.DE and QDVE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer