EDMJ.DE vs. JP40.DE
EDMJ.DE (iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc) and JP40.DE (Amundi JPX Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF EUR) are both Japan Equities funds - EDMJ.DE tracks the MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus while JP40.DE tracks the JPX-Nikkei 400. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDMJ.DE returned 9.20%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for JP40.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDMJ.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JP40.DE.
Performance
EDMJ.DE vs. JP40.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EDMJ.DE having a 16.26% return and JP40.DE slightly lower at 16.15%.
EDMJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.26%
- YTD
- 16.26%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 31.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- —
JP40.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 16.15%
- 6M
- 16.32%
- 1Y
- 28.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.93%
EDMJ.DE vs. JP40.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDMJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc | 16.26% | 12.89% | 10.91% | 15.92% | -13.20% | 9.60% | 5.87% | 12.14% |
JP40.DE Amundi JPX Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF EUR | 16.15% | 12.78% | 13.18% | 15.77% | -11.05% | 8.49% | 4.79% | 10.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDMJ.DE and JP40.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between EDMJ.DE and JP40.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDMJ.DE vs. JP40.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EDMJ.DE
JP40.DE
EDMJ.DE vs. JP40.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE) and Amundi JPX Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF EUR (JP40.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDMJ.DE | JP40.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.03 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.83 | 10.04 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDMJ.DE | JP40.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.58 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.59 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.46 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
EDMJ.DE vs. JP40.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDMJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.95%, roughly equal to the maximum JP40.DE drawdown of -28.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDMJ.DE and JP40.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDMJ.DE | JP40.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.95% | -28.51% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -9.43% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -15.82% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.81% | -19.66% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.23% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.13% | -6.10% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.85% | +0.30% |
Volatility
EDMJ.DE vs. JP40.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Amundi JPX Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF EUR (JP40.DE) at 3.29%. This indicates that EDMJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JP40.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDMJ.DE | JP40.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 3.29% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 14.70% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.21% | 18.10% | +1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 16.56% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 16.50% | +1.02% |
EDMJ.DE vs. JP40.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDMJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JP40.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDMJ.DE vs. JP40.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDMJ.DE nor JP40.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EDMJ.DE and JP40.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EDMJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDMJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JP40.DE.
EDMJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus, while JP40.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei 400. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EDMJ.DE and 0.18% for JP40.DE.
Find the right allocation for EDMJ.DE and JP40.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer