PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDM2.DE vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDM2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDM2.DE achieves a 26.35% return, which is significantly higher than NQSE.DE's 17.82% return.


EDM2.DE

1D
-1.45%
1M
3.82%
YTD
26.35%
6M
26.81%
1Y
46.28%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*

NQSE.DE

1D
-0.77%
1M
6.66%
YTD
17.82%
6M
17.09%
1Y
35.67%
3Y*
25.27%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDM2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EDM2.DE
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
26.35%19.81%13.36%4.56%-16.00%4.73%7.76%7.05%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
17.82%18.16%24.07%52.10%-36.29%27.37%45.23%9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EDM2.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019

0.60

The correlation between EDM2.DE and NQSE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (5 years) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDM2.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDM2.DE
EDM2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EDM2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDM2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDM2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EDM2.DENQSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.39

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

3.08

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.65

10.77

+4.88

EDM2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDM2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDM2.DE and NQSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EDM2.DENQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.28

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.71

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.82

-0.32

Drawdowns

EDM2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDM2.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDM2.DE and NQSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDM2.DENQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.32%

-37.67%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-11.87%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.52%

-22.40%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

-37.67%

+12.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-0.84%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-8.56%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.40%

-0.39%

Volatility

EDM2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) at 4.75%. This indicates that EDM2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDM2.DENQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

4.75%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.11%

11.99%

+3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.92%

16.05%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

20.91%

-4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

21.54%

-2.41%

EDM2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDM2.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDM2.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EDM2.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EDM2.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EDM2.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDM2.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

EDM2.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. EDM2.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EDM2.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDM2.DE and NQSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer