EDM2.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
EDM2.DE (iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IUSQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EDM2.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus, while IUSQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDM2.DE returned 7.59%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for IUSQ.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDM2.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IUSQ.DE.
Performance
EDM2.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDM2.DE achieves a 26.35% return, which is significantly higher than IUSQ.DE's 12.65% return.
EDM2.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 26.35%
- 6M
- 26.81%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 26.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
EDM2.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDM2.DE iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 26.35% | 19.81% | 13.36% | 4.56% | -16.00% | 4.73% | 7.76% | 7.05% |
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 12.65% | 9.02% | 24.53% | 18.57% | -13.58% | 29.13% | 4.94% | 6.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDM2.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019 | 0.72 |
The correlation between EDM2.DE and IUSQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDM2.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EDM2.DE
IUSQ.DE
EDM2.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDM2.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.43 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | 4.08 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.65 | 16.69 | -1.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDM2.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.31 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.88 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.76 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
EDM2.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDM2.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, roughly equal to the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDM2.DE and IUSQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDM2.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.32% | -33.60% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -6.48% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.52% | -21.25% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.43% | -21.25% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -0.55% | -2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -4.19% | -6.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 1.59% | +1.42% |
Volatility
EDM2.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) at 3.03%. This indicates that EDM2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDM2.DE | IUSQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 3.03% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.11% | 8.26% | +6.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 11.47% | +6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 13.94% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 15.02% | +4.11% |
EDM2.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDM2.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDM2.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDM2.DE nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EDM2.DE and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDM2.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDM2.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
EDM2.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. EDM2.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EDM2.DE and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for EDM2.DE and IUSQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer