EDM2.DE vs. GLD
EDM2.DE (iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - EDM2.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDM2.DE returned 7.59%/yr vs 19.45%/yr for GLD. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EDM2.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
EDM2.DE vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EDM2.DE is traded in EUR, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDM2.DE achieves a 26.35% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 4.96% return.
EDM2.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 26.35%
- 6M
- 26.81%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 6.67%
- 1Y
- 31.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.58%
- 5Y*
- 19.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
EDM2.DE vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDM2.DE iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 26.35% | 19.81% | 13.36% | 4.56% | -16.00% | 4.73% | 7.76% | 7.05% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 1.94% | 44.25% | 35.02% | 9.31% | 5.38% | 3.02% | 14.53% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDM2.DE and GLD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019 | 0.11 |
The correlation between EDM2.DE and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDM2.DE vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
EDM2.DE
GLD
EDM2.DE vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDM2.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.25 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | 1.82 | +2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.65 | 4.30 | +11.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDM2.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 1.24 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 1.17 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.65 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
EDM2.DE vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDM2.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -37.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDM2.DE and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDM2.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.32% | -37.47% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -17.14% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.52% | -17.14% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.43% | -17.14% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -15.52% | +12.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -12.17% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 7.23% | -4.22% |
Volatility
EDM2.DE vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 3.75%. This indicates that EDM2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDM2.DE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 3.75% | +3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.11% | 21.79% | -6.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 25.17% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 16.69% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 14.91% | +4.22% |
EDM2.DE vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDM2.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDM2.DE vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDM2.DE nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EDM2.DE and GLD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDM2.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDM2.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
EDM2.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GLD is Gold. EDM2.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EDM2.DE and 0.40% for GLD.
Find the right allocation for EDM2.DE and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer