EDM2.DE vs. EUNZ.DE
EDM2.DE (iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EUNZ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - EDM2.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus while EUNZ.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDM2.DE returned 7.59%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for EUNZ.DE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EDM2.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EUNZ.DE.
Performance
EDM2.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDM2.DE achieves a 26.35% return, which is significantly higher than EUNZ.DE's 18.69% return.
EDM2.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 26.35%
- 6M
- 26.81%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNZ.DE
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 17.92%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 6.20%
EDM2.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDM2.DE iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 26.35% | 19.81% | 13.36% | 4.56% | -16.00% | 4.73% | 7.76% | 7.05% |
EUNZ.DE iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 18.69% | -0.15% | 15.73% | 3.85% | -8.85% | 13.05% | -2.49% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDM2.DE and EUNZ.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between EDM2.DE and EUNZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDM2.DE vs. EUNZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EDM2.DE
EUNZ.DE
EDM2.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDM2.DE | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | 3.00 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.65 | 10.57 | +5.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDM2.DE | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 1.85 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.35 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
EDM2.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDM2.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, which is greater than EUNZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDM2.DE and EUNZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDM2.DE | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.32% | -30.47% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -7.50% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.52% | -14.00% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.43% | -14.00% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -1.96% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -7.62% | -3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.13% | +0.88% |
Volatility
EDM2.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) at 4.75%. This indicates that EDM2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDM2.DE | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 4.75% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.11% | 10.35% | +4.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 12.18% | +5.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 11.41% | +5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 13.32% | +5.81% |
EDM2.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDM2.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EDM2.DE vs. EUNZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDM2.DE nor EUNZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EDM2.DE and EUNZ.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDM2.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDM2.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.
EDM2.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus, while EUNZ.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EDM2.DE and 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for EDM2.DE and EUNZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer