EDM2.DE vs. EUNL.DE
EDM2.DE (iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EUNL.DE (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EDM2.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus, while EUNL.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EDM2.DE returned 7.59%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for EUNL.DE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDM2.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EUNL.DE.
Performance
EDM2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDM2.DE achieves a 26.35% return, which is significantly higher than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return.
EDM2.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 26.35%
- 6M
- 26.81%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNL.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
EDM2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDM2.DE iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 26.35% | 19.81% | 13.36% | 4.56% | -16.00% | 4.73% | 7.76% | 7.05% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.86% | 7.90% | 25.93% | 20.13% | -13.59% | 32.71% | 5.48% | 5.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between EDM2.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019 | 0.65 |
The correlation between EDM2.DE and EUNL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EDM2.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EDM2.DE
EUNL.DE
EDM2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDM2.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.40 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | 3.64 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.65 | 14.52 | +1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDM2.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.12 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.90 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.82 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
EDM2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDM2.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, roughly equal to the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDM2.DE and EUNL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDM2.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.32% | -33.63% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -6.50% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.52% | -21.73% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.43% | -21.73% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -0.31% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -4.25% | -6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 1.64% | +1.37% |
Volatility
EDM2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EDM2.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that EDM2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EDM2.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 2.62% | +4.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.11% | 7.72% | +7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 11.16% | +6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 14.17% | +2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 15.17% | +3.96% |
EDM2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDM2.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EDM2.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDM2.DE nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EDM2.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDM2.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDM2.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
EDM2.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. EDM2.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Enhanced Focus, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EDM2.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
Find the right allocation for EDM2.DE and EUNL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer