EDIV.L vs. X7PS.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

EDIV.L (Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and X7PS.L (Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EDIV.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while X7PS.L tracks the Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EDIV.L returned 13.57%/yr vs 44.04%/yr for X7PS.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.

Performance

EDIV.L vs. X7PS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EDIV.L is traded in GBP, while X7PS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the X7PS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV.L achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than X7PS.L's 14.56% return.

EDIV.L

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 1.28%
• 6M: 7.30%
• YTD: 7.59%
• 1Y: 12.04%
• 3Y*: 13.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

X7PS.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 4.26%
• 6M: 11.91%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 1Y: 49.84%
• 3Y*: 44.04%
• 5Y*: 31.75%
• 10Y*: 16.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV.L vs. X7PS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EDIV.L Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	7.59%	22.05%	4.13%	13.56%	-8.58%	-17.19%
X7PS.L Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF	14.56%	87.84%	27.12%	23.19%	5.63%	6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV.L and X7PS.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2021	0.59

The correlation between EDIV.L and X7PS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EDIV.L vs. X7PS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV.L

EDIV.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
EDIV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EDIV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EDIV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EDIV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
EDIV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

X7PS.L

X7PS.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
X7PS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
X7PS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
X7PS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
X7PS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV.L vs. X7PS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDIV.L	X7PS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	2.23	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	2.94	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.37	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	3.10	-1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	10.36	-6.14

EDIV.L vs. X7PS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the X7PS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV.L and X7PS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EDIV.L vs. X7PS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.07%, smaller than the maximum X7PS.L drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV.L and X7PS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDIV.L	X7PS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.07%	-56.34%	+22.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-16.07%	+7.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.15%	-18.22%	+8.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.73%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-1.80%	+1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.53%	-14.49%	+0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	4.81%	-2.04%

Volatility

EDIV.L vs. X7PS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) is 2.62%, while Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that EDIV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDIV.L	X7PS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	5.39%	-2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.05%	18.89%	-9.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.83%	22.30%	-11.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	23.78%	-8.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.47%	24.60%	-9.13%

EDIV.L vs. X7PS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EDIV.L and X7PS.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

Dividends

EDIV.L vs. X7PS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EDIV.L nor X7PS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDIV.L and X7PS.L in my portfolio?

EDIV.L and X7PS.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EDIV.L or X7PS.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EDIV.L or X7PS.L?

EDIV.L and X7PS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

What is the main difference between EDIV.L and X7PS.L?

EDIV.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while X7PS.L tracks Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco.