PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDIV.L vs. FRXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDIV.L vs. FRXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EDIV.L is traded in GBP, while FRXD.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FRXD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIV.L achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than FRXD.L's 8.97% return.


EDIV.L

1D
0.76%
1M
1.28%
6M
7.30%
YTD
7.59%
1Y
12.04%
3Y*
13.57%
5Y*
10Y*

FRXD.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.54%
6M
8.87%
YTD
8.97%
1Y
17.48%
3Y*
19.46%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV.L vs. FRXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EDIV.L
Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
7.59%22.05%4.13%13.56%-8.58%-17.19%
FRXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
8.97%30.65%7.63%8.12%5.16%-2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIV.L and FRXD.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2021

0.71

The correlation between EDIV.L and FRXD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDIV.L vs. FRXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV.L
EDIV.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EDIV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FRXD.L
FRXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FRXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV.L vs. FRXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDIV.LFRXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.34

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

4.77

-3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.22

10.85

-6.63

EDIV.L vs. FRXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the FRXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIV.L and FRXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDIV.L vs. FRXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.07%, which is greater than FRXD.L's maximum drawdown of -29.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV.L and FRXD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDIV.LFRXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.07%

-29.39%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-3.59%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.15%

-8.29%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-3.41%

+2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.53%

-3.52%

-10.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

1.58%

+1.19%

Volatility

EDIV.L vs. FRXD.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRXD.L) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDIV.LFRXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.63%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

7.06%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

8.90%

+1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

11.33%

+4.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

13.38%

+2.09%

EDIV.L vs. FRXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FRXD.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EDIV.L vs. FRXD.L - Dividend Comparison

EDIV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EDIV.L
Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
3.98%4.28%4.30%5.00%5.20%4.63%3.53%4.42%5.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDIV.L and FRXD.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EDIV.L.

EDIV.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while FRXD.L tracks Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EDIV.L and 0.25% for FRXD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDIV.L and FRXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer