EDIAX vs. NMAI

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

EDIAX (Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund) and NMAI (Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 3 years, EDIAX returned 13.43%/yr vs 18.19%/yr for NMAI. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EDIAX charges 1.17%/yr vs 2.91%/yr for NMAI.

Performance

EDIAX vs. NMAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund (EDIAX) and Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDIAX achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than NMAI's 12.55% return.

EDIAX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.52%
• 6M: 5.12%
• YTD: 7.24%
• 1Y: 15.94%
• 3Y*: 13.43%
• 5Y*: 7.27%
• 10Y*: 8.60%

NMAI

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: 1.56%
• 6M: 9.39%
• YTD: 12.55%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 18.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIAX vs. NMAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EDIAX Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund	7.24%	19.06%	7.87%	18.49%	-16.78%	0.79%
NMAI Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund	12.55%	20.03%	11.65%	19.52%	-26.38%	-4.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EDIAX and NMAI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2021	0.69

The correlation between EDIAX and NMAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EDIAX vs. NMAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIAX

EDIAX Risk / Return Rank: 45
EDIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
EDIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
EDIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
EDIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EDIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

NMAI

NMAI Risk / Return Rank: 50
NMAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NMAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
NMAI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
NMAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
NMAI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIAX vs. NMAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund (EDIAX) and Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EDIAX	NMAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.74	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.37	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.31	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.00	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.45	8.34	+0.10

EDIAX vs. NMAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the NMAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDIAX and NMAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EDIAX vs. NMAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIAX drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, which is greater than NMAI's maximum drawdown of -37.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIAX and NMAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDIAX	NMAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.79%	-37.40%	-14.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.41%	-11.88%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.74%	-13.05%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-2.67%	+1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.13%	-13.74%	+3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	2.84%	-0.91%

Volatility

EDIAX vs. NMAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund (EDIAX) is 2.79%, while Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that EDIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDIAX	NMAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	4.88%	-2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.67%	11.77%	-3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.25%	13.64%	-3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.66%	16.65%	-4.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.03%	16.65%	-4.62%

EDIAX vs. NMAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIAX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than NMAI's 2.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

EDIAX vs. NMAI - Dividend Comparison

EDIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, less than NMAI's 10.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDIAX Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund	5.01%	4.12%	7.64%	3.36%	3.54%	4.07%	3.15%	3.36%	4.00%	3.24%	3.63%	3.94%
NMAI Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund	10.35%	9.89%	13.73%	10.57%	19.45%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EDIAX and NMAI in my portfolio?

EDIAX and NMAI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EDIAX or NMAI?

NMAI has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to EDIAX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDIAX dropped -51.79% vs NMAI's -37.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.